2016 primaries (both parties) with no Russian interference
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 07:16:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016 primaries (both parties) with no Russian interference		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016 primaries (both parties) with no Russian interference  (Read 439 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 18, 2018, 11:29:33 AM »
Suppose Russia does nothing to interfere in the US elections in the 2016 election cycle.  Do either the Democratic or Republican primaries change at all?  Do any states vote differently?  Are the final national vote totals for any candidate even 1% different?
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2018, 12:54:34 PM »
Trump is not the Republican nominee, instead it's probably Cruz or Rubio.

Clinton still wins the Democratic nomination.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2018, 01:03:35 PM »
Quote from: NewYorkExpress on February 18, 2018, 12:54:34 PM
Trump is not the Republican nominee, instead it's probably Cruz or Rubio.

Clinton still wins the Democratic nomination.
You’re probably right. I would say that the only primaries that Trump would win are West Virginia, Alabama, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York. I also feel that John Kasich would do a lot better, perhaps winning the Republican nomination after a brokered convention.
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,240


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2018, 03:15:55 PM »
Quote from: NewYorkExpress on February 18, 2018, 12:54:34 PM
Trump is not the Republican nominee, instead it's probably Cruz or Rubio.

Clinton still wins the Democratic nomination.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2018, 02:09:03 AM »
No differences, Rubio went too far in with TV ads and not enough ground game. Cruz relied too much on a narrow base.

Trump was pretty much a lock after Rubio turned out to be a paper tiger, and was highly favored after the first debate.

And as for Dems, Bernie didn't really take off until Michigan. Sure Iowa was close, and he won NH, but he didn't seem that serious and even let The South be a slaughter which locked in for Hillary.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,756


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2018, 08:37:48 AM »
Quote from: L.D. Smith, Aggie! It's Real Expenses Again on February 19, 2018, 02:09:03 AM
No differences, Rubio went too far in with TV ads and not enough ground game. Cruz relied too much on a narrow base.

Trump was pretty much a lock after Rubio turned out to be a paper tiger, and was highly favored after the first debate.

And as for Dems, Bernie didn't really take off until Michigan. Sure Iowa was close, and he won NH, but he didn't seem that serious and even let The South be a slaughter which locked in for Hillary.

Agreed
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.