Laura Ingraham is mocking a Parkland survivor for struggling to get into college

[Helsinkian]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/381148-flynns-son-parkland-student-hoggs-parents-didnt-smack-him

[DINGO Joe]

Ted Nugent unsurprisingly is the latest triggered snowflake. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/381108-ted-nugent-parkland-students-protesting-gun-violence-are

"These poor children, I’m afraid to say this and it hurts me to say this, but the evidence is irrefutable, they have no soul," he added.

And Frank Stallone:

Sylvester Stallone’s younger brother Frank set off a wave of insults across Twitter Saturday after calling Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg a “p—y,” “little bitch” and a “coward” — and suggesting that the teenager deserves a “sucker punch.”

https://www.thewrap.com/frank-stallone-calls-david-hogg-headline-grabbing-punk-twitter-punches-back/

And Michael Flynn's son, Whoever Flynn

"Someone (hint: parents) clearly didn’t smack this kid much growing up. Your emotional high will run out soon so savor it while it lasts...."

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/381148-flynns-son-parkland-student-hoggs-parents-didnt-smack-him

I'm only a Scott Baio tweet away from having BINGO on my card.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Flynn Jr. would be probably better off is he spent a couple of years in the joint.
Would have probably cleared his head a bit.

[kyc0705]

I'm only a Scott Baio tweet away from having BINGO on my card.

Charles in charge of our alts and our rights...

[Lord Admirale]

Tbh you forfeit the right to be dealt with as a child when you enter the political arena. Hogg is 17, not 7. He'll be an adult very soon.

I couldn't disagree more with Ingraham on policy, but Hogg is behaving more and more like a fascist with this kind of attitude.

Time for that blue avatar, buddy. You've officially become a goddamned parody.

I'm a Republican how...?

You've lied and said that David Hogg blamed Laura Ingraham for his not getting into college. That's the sort of spin that Republicans put out to defend their favorites.

Show me where

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Notice that Ingraham was never mentioned in that statement, alright?

You are implying that he was blaming someone and considering this is a thread about Ingraham it seems clear what your intent was. Whatever.

Did I actually imply that he was blaming Ingraham? Or is that what you want to see?

[publicunofficial]

I think most Republicans, if given the option, would murder the surviving Parkland students.

[Fuzzy Bear]

I'm only a Scott Baio tweet away from having BINGO on my card.

Charles in charge of our alts and our rights...

It's too late to delete this post!  I'll be humming this all day!!!

[DrScholl]

I think most Republicans, if given the option, would murder the surviving Parkland students.

As out there as that sounds I think you are right.

[publicunofficial]

I think most Republicans, if given the option, would murder the surviving Parkland students.

As out there as that sounds I think you are right.

They'll never admit it, but the narrative has shifted among tight wing loon circles to basically "Cruz was a proud gun owner doing the ultimate version of owning the libs"

[Landslide Lyndon]

So surprising.
Not.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/russian-bots-support-fox-news-host-laura-ingraham-amid-advertiser-exodus-2018-3

 As companies yank their ads from Fox News commentator Laura Ingraham's show in droves, she continues to draw support from one key Twitter demographic: Russian bots.

The advertiser exodus comes after Ingraham insulted Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg's grades on Twitter. The Fox News host announced Saturday that she would be taking a "pre-planned vacation" amid the controversy.

On Saturday evening, #istandwithlaura was the top trending hashtag among Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence operations, according to Hamilton 68, a website launched last year that tracks Russian propaganda campaigns in near-real time.

Per the site's data, the frequency with which the accounts tweeted the hashtag jumped by 2800% on Friday and Saturday.

[libertpaulian]

LOL It's not just Laura Ingraham. Most people on my facebook list are doing this LOL Men and women of all ages.

Is this what you people do in Trumpland? Mock a kid (who survived a school massacre) who is only fighting for the right of his fellow students to attend school without fearing for their lives? Besides being extremely pathetic and f**ked up, it reeks of insecurity.

He's a little left wing weasel who craves attention and has a foul mouth. He isn't old enough to vote, isn't old enough to drink, isn't old enough to "buy a gun" and is irrelevant. I'm sorry. The number one thing I keep hearing from my fellow thirty-somethings is "Why do we care what the kids think?"

This is a truism.

http://www.hsrtx.org/

Do you care what those kids think?

The generation that was led to the slaughter in Vietnam was David Hogg's age, and thirty-somethings didn't care what they thought either.  They couldn't vote, either; not until they were 21.

Yes, David Hogg comes of as a liberal snot-nose.  I was young and snot-nosed once as well, but I registered to vote on my 18th birthday.  He'll be voting in 2020, as will many of the Parkland kids.

While I'm not enamored of the opinions of the David Hogg's of the world, or of the Lebron James' of the World, they are entitled to speak them, and it's intellectually dishonest of a pundit to begrudge these folks their podiums.  Ingraham has 30 minutes a night to pontificate, and she has no real special qualifications to do so.  David Hogg's argument is based on emotional reasoning, but please don't tell me that FOX News isn't beyond making emotional appeals to defy logic when it suits them.

Instead of telling folks who've cut into the allotment of national media attention without the permission of pundits to shut up and do what they do, why don't folks who disagree with these folks do the hard work of convincing people that David Hogg is wrong and they are right as far as the 2nd Amendment goes.  David Hogg has the emotion of the moment; 2nd Amendment activists have the intent of the Framers, the wording of the 2nd Amendment itself, and the idea that the 2nd Amendment is about a fundamental Constitutional Right.  No one seems to want to do the work of convincing folks who disagree with them that their point of view is right.  Perhaps that fact is somewhat behind the polarized politics we have today.

Anti gun control Advocates do not, repeat do not have the intent of the framers on their side. Sorry FB, but the whole concept that the 2nd Amendment applies to individual gun rights is a very very recent Construction from so-called originalist intent calendar boy justice Scalia. Now whether one could argue that it should be expanded to that point, and then shut up ever talking about legislating From the Bench or creating the law arrived in interpreting it, is one's own choice. But don't miss appropriate the framers in this debate.

Actually, gun rights advocates do have the founders on their side.  Read the Federalist Papers.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Bayer AG pulled out. I don't think she is returning from that "Pre-planned Vacation."

[7,052,770]

Why is only people advocate the conservative position on an issue who try to group "the founders" into a monolithic block?

The founders were just as diverse in ideology and opinions as modern politics were. There is no issue in which they all shared an opinion, despite what they blue and yellow avatars pretend.

[HAnnA MArin County]

On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, you guys know that Jesus would be defending our constitutional right to own every gun in the world over the "right" of teenagers to not be gunned down in schools, right? 

Signed,
The Pro-Life Party of Traditional Family Values

[Torrain]

Bayer AG pulled out. I don't think she is returning from that "Pre-planned Vacation."

Sounds like O’Reilly 2.0 at this point

[Badger]

I'm only a Scott Baio tweet away from having BINGO on my card.

Charles in charge of our alts and our rights...

And you sir, win the internet

[Slander and/or Libel]

LOL It's not just Laura Ingraham. Most people on my facebook list are doing this LOL Men and women of all ages.

Is this what you people do in Trumpland? Mock a kid (who survived a school massacre) who is only fighting for the right of his fellow students to attend school without fearing for their lives? Besides being extremely pathetic and f**ked up, it reeks of insecurity.

He's a little left wing weasel who craves attention and has a foul mouth. He isn't old enough to vote, isn't old enough to drink, isn't old enough to "buy a gun" and is irrelevant. I'm sorry. The number one thing I keep hearing from my fellow thirty-somethings is "Why do we care what the kids think?"

This is a truism.

http://www.hsrtx.org/

Do you care what those kids think?

The generation that was led to the slaughter in Vietnam was David Hogg's age, and thirty-somethings didn't care what they thought either.  They couldn't vote, either; not until they were 21.

Yes, David Hogg comes of as a liberal snot-nose.  I was young and snot-nosed once as well, but I registered to vote on my 18th birthday.  He'll be voting in 2020, as will many of the Parkland kids.

While I'm not enamored of the opinions of the David Hogg's of the world, or of the Lebron James' of the World, they are entitled to speak them, and it's intellectually dishonest of a pundit to begrudge these folks their podiums.  Ingraham has 30 minutes a night to pontificate, and she has no real special qualifications to do so.  David Hogg's argument is based on emotional reasoning, but please don't tell me that FOX News isn't beyond making emotional appeals to defy logic when it suits them.

Instead of telling folks who've cut into the allotment of national media attention without the permission of pundits to shut up and do what they do, why don't folks who disagree with these folks do the hard work of convincing people that David Hogg is wrong and they are right as far as the 2nd Amendment goes.  David Hogg has the emotion of the moment; 2nd Amendment activists have the intent of the Framers, the wording of the 2nd Amendment itself, and the idea that the 2nd Amendment is about a fundamental Constitutional Right.  No one seems to want to do the work of convincing folks who disagree with them that their point of view is right.  Perhaps that fact is somewhat behind the polarized politics we have today.

Anti gun control Advocates do not, repeat do not have the intent of the framers on their side. Sorry FB, but the whole concept that the 2nd Amendment applies to individual gun rights is a very very recent Construction from so-called originalist intent calendar boy justice Scalia. Now whether one could argue that it should be expanded to that point, and then shut up ever talking about legislating From the Bench or creating the law arrived in interpreting it, is one's own choice. But don't miss appropriate the framers in this debate.

Actually, gun rights advocates do have the founders on their side.  Read the Federalist Papers.

Gimme the number of the papers you're referring to and I'll give them a spin.

[Slander and/or Libel]

Anti gun control Advocates do not, repeat do not have the intent of the framers on their side. Sorry FB, but the whole concept that the 2nd Amendment applies to individual gun rights is a very very recent Construction from so-called originalist intent calendar boy justice Scalia. Now whether one could argue that it should be expanded to that point, and then shut up ever talking about legislating From the Bench or creating the law arrived in interpreting it, is one's own choice. But don't miss appropriate the framers in this debate.

This is exactly the thing. People who call themselves originalist say that we need to read the Constitution exactly as it was read in 1789, but we need to read the Second Amendment exactly as Antonin Scalia said we should read it in 2008. Cool consistency, guys.

[Badger]

LOL It's not just Laura Ingraham. Most people on my facebook list are doing this LOL Men and women of all ages.

Is this what you people do in Trumpland? Mock a kid (who survived a school massacre) who is only fighting for the right of his fellow students to attend school without fearing for their lives? Besides being extremely pathetic and f**ked up, it reeks of insecurity.

He's a little left wing weasel who craves attention and has a foul mouth. He isn't old enough to vote, isn't old enough to drink, isn't old enough to "buy a gun" and is irrelevant. I'm sorry. The number one thing I keep hearing from my fellow thirty-somethings is "Why do we care what the kids think?"

This is a truism.

http://www.hsrtx.org/

Do you care what those kids think?

The generation that was led to the slaughter in Vietnam was David Hogg's age, and thirty-somethings didn't care what they thought either.  They couldn't vote, either; not until they were 21.

Yes, David Hogg comes of as a liberal snot-nose.  I was young and snot-nosed once as well, but I registered to vote on my 18th birthday.  He'll be voting in 2020, as will many of the Parkland kids.

While I'm not enamored of the opinions of the David Hogg's of the world, or of the Lebron James' of the World, they are entitled to speak them, and it's intellectually dishonest of a pundit to begrudge these folks their podiums.  Ingraham has 30 minutes a night to pontificate, and she has no real special qualifications to do so.  David Hogg's argument is based on emotional reasoning, but please don't tell me that FOX News isn't beyond making emotional appeals to defy logic when it suits them.

Instead of telling folks who've cut into the allotment of national media attention without the permission of pundits to shut up and do what they do, why don't folks who disagree with these folks do the hard work of convincing people that David Hogg is wrong and they are right as far as the 2nd Amendment goes.  David Hogg has the emotion of the moment; 2nd Amendment activists have the intent of the Framers, the wording of the 2nd Amendment itself, and the idea that the 2nd Amendment is about a fundamental Constitutional Right.  No one seems to want to do the work of convincing folks who disagree with them that their point of view is right.  Perhaps that fact is somewhat behind the polarized politics we have today.

Anti gun control Advocates do not, repeat do not have the intent of the framers on their side. Sorry FB, but the whole concept that the 2nd Amendment applies to individual gun rights is a very very recent Construction from so-called originalist intent calendar boy justice Scalia. Now whether one could argue that it should be expanded to that point, and then shut up ever talking about legislating From the Bench or creating the law arrived in interpreting it, is one's own choice. But don't miss appropriate the framers in this debate.

Actually, gun rights advocates do have the founders on their side.  Read the Federalist Papers.

Gimme the number of the papers you're referring to and I'll give them a spin.