Would you consider this map a landslide?

[Sherrod Brown Shill]

The Republican gets 381 EV, the Democrat gets 157.

[libertpaulian]

Landslide-ish.  However, if the GOP is winning OR and VT, then they're winning NM, DE, and NJ, possibly even CT.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Yes, very close to it. if the Republican wins Vermont though, I'd assume they're winning a 49 or 50 state landslide.

[bagelman]

In the sense that 1988 was a landslide.

[Josecardoso17]

Yes

[Medal506]

The Republican gets 381 EV, the Democrat gets 157.

That's more than what Obama got in 2008

[Glenmore]

In the sense that 1988 was a landslide.

this specific quote has me thinking. I'm interested: how is 1988 not a true landslide?

[bagelman]

In the sense that 1988 was a landslide.

this specific quote has me thinking. I'm interested: how is 1988 not a true landslide?

What is and was is not a landslide is inherently arbitrary and based on personal interpretation. 1988 could be considered a landslide by some although some states clearly went Dem, but is less of a landslide than 1984 where the Dems just barely managed a single state.

[BlueDogs2020]

New Mexico definitely would not go to the Democrat in this situation! I think Delaware, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Rhode Island would flip before Vermont, Illinois, and New Mexico.

[Pandaguineapig]

Yes, very close to it. if the Republican wins Vermont though, I'd assume they're winning a 49 or 50 state landslide.

I actually think that in a Republican landslide that Vermont would go atlas blue before Maryland, California, or Hawaii because the state is historically more elastic and the state being universally white

[CookieDamage]

More plausible imo