Did immigration effect the results of the 1996 election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:05:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Did immigration effect the results of the 1996 election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did immigration effect the results of the 1996 election?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: Did immigration effect the results of the 1996 election?  (Read 1795 times)
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528


« on: April 10, 2018, 11:01:26 PM »

I actually think Dole outperformed in 1996

Clinton really should have won over 400 electoral votes in 1996 (which he would have if he held GA CO and MT)
I agree. I remember reading that during the final weeks of the 1996 camapign, Clinton was ahead in Colorado, Montana, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, South Dakota, Texas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Alabama, but instead focused most of his attention on Florida and Arizona, two states that he desperately wanted to win.

Source? The bolded states seem like a stretch to me.
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528


« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2018, 03:00:06 PM »
« Edited: April 14, 2018, 03:03:47 PM by TheElectoralBoobyPrize »

I actually think Dole outperformed in 1996

Clinton really should have won over 400 electoral votes in 1996 (which he would have if he held GA CO and MT)
I agree. I remember reading that during the final weeks of the 1996 camapign, Clinton was ahead in Colorado, Montana, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, South Dakota, Texas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Alabama, but instead focused most of his attention on Florida and Arizona, two states that he desperately wanted to win.

Source? The bolded states seem like a stretch to me.


There was a huge turnout collapse for Clinton in 1996. In hindsight people are impressed by his 9 point win, but he was ahead in the polls by 15-20 points nationally. That would have been closing in a Reagan 1984 or Ike like win.

The 15-20 point lead was months before the election..it had narrowed to the low double digits as Republicans came home.  Maybe the best case scenario for Clinton was adding MT, CO, GA, VA, and maybeeee NC.

I agree that given the fundamentals, the race should've been an even bigger blowout, but we can start to see polarization in this election. And a lot of people just didn't like Clinton's character while Dole was noncontroversial.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 15 queries.