How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:19:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire?  (Read 1866 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
« on: April 21, 2018, 11:18:29 AM »
Quote from: Punxsutawney Phil on April 19, 2018, 05:08:18 PM
Would it be logical to assume the more rural a Southern state was circa '88, the better Dukakis did in it?

I think so, yes.  Dukakis was the last Dem nominee for whom rural support was > suburban support in most of the country.  Clinton 1992 continued this in much of the South, but not elsewhere.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.