How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:06:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire?  (Read 1862 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,715
United States


WWW
« on: April 29, 2018, 07:47:10 PM »

Maybe one reason Louisiana was his best Southern state was because those Cajuns had less of a problem with his foreign-sounding name than other Southerners had.  Dukakis carried most of Cajun Country.

The Catholic Cajun South Louisiana was more Democratic at the Presidential level than the Protestant North.  This ended somewhat abruptly around 2004, and the Obama years erased the differences.

Bill Clinton carried Louisiana 52-40 in 1996.  Thank about that.  Gore WOULD have carried it had he not been so strongly associated with the anti-fossil fuel movement. 

The outmigration of blacks displaced by Hurricane Katrina was significant.  I consider it the catalyst for the total downballot shift to the GOP in LA.  Gov. Katherine Blanco's  inept performance during Katrina didn't help, either.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.