I agree with using the Cube Root Rule. It certainly is the best method, due to being very objective.
The Wyoming Rule could cause massive fluctuations in House size depending on what the smallest state is, and how its growing in relation with the largest state (obviously not a problem now but it could be in the future). The Cube Root Rule, though, is more stable, so I like it. 👍
For example, let's try out the 2000, 2016, and 2020 elections with the Cube Root Rule:
2000 U.S. Presidential election
NOTES:
Populations apportioned based on the 1990 U.S. Census;
CT and RI have 10 and 5 EVs respectively
Image Link[D] Al Gore/Joe Lieberman - 367 Electoral Votes - 48.5% of the popular vote ✅
[R] George W. Bush/Dick Cheney - 364 Electoral Votes - 47.9% of the popular vote Beautiful!!!
2016 U.S. Presidential election
NOTES:
Populations apportioned based on the 2010 U.S. Census;
CT and RI have 10 and 4 EVs respectively
Image Link[R] Donald Trump/Mike Pence - 443 Electoral Votes - 45.9% of the popular vote ✅
[D] Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine - 335 Electoral Votes - 48.0% of the popular voteDue to the winner-take-all system used in most states, Clinton still takes the L.
Also, yes, I'm ignoring Maine and Nebraska both here and in the 2020 election. Not gonna try to make guesses.
2020 U.S. Presidential election
Image Link[D] Joe Biden/Kamala Harris - 442 Electoral Votes - 51.3% of the popular vote ✅
[R] Donald Trump/Mike Pence - 336 Electoral Votes - 46.8% of the popular vote