Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 17, 2019, 01:51:19 am
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Atlas Forum
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: Torie, Senator ON Progressive)
  Why did Goldwater do better in Illinois than he did Nationally
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Why did Goldwater do better in Illinois than he did Nationally  (Read 628 times)
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,516


Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -0.10

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 29, 2018, 06:43:00 pm »

He did better in Illinois than he did Nationally :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Illinois,_1964


He even did better in Illinois than he did in Ohio
Logged
Calthrina950
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,015
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2018, 02:11:22 pm »

He did better in Illinois than he did Nationally :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Illinois,_1964


He even did better in Illinois than he did in Ohio

Goldwater did very well in the Chicago suburbs, which were very much a Republican bastion at the time. This is what kept Johnson under 60%. Moreover, Cook County was not as heavily Democratic then as it is now-Johnson got in the sixties there, whereas Hillary Clinton, for example, broke 70% in 2016.
Logged
RINO Tom
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12,972
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2018, 03:00:03 pm »

He did better in Illinois than he did Nationally :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Illinois,_1964


He even did better in Illinois than he did in Ohio

Goldwater did very well in the Chicago suburbs, which were very much a Republican bastion at the time. This is what kept Johnson under 60%. Moreover, Cook County was not as heavily Democratic then as it is now-Johnson got in the sixties there, whereas Hillary Clinton, for example, broke 70% in 2016.

Pretty much this, plus 1) Cook County wasn't quite as urban then (the Cook suburbs seemed to have voted a lot more like the Collar Counties do now, and the Collar Counties voted a lot more like McHenry County now) and therefore less Democratic, and 2) Southern Illinois' ancestrally Democratic lean was more akin to that of Kentucky than that of Mississippi and therefore much, much more likely to stick with LBJ.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC