CPRM, Pt 2: AL (RO) 7/17; GA (RO) 7/24; TN 8/2; 274K ballots left in CA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:27:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CPRM, Pt 2: AL (RO) 7/17; GA (RO) 7/24; TN 8/2; 274K ballots left in CA (search mode)
Thread note

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CPRM, Pt 2: AL (RO) 7/17; GA (RO) 7/24; TN 8/2; 274K ballots left in CA  (Read 105683 times)
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

« on: June 25, 2018, 07:31:24 PM »

In terms of two candidate preferred, California 10 ended up as a comfortable win for the Democrats (around 55-45% 17,500-14,500) while California 39 was a blow out.

what do you mean by "two candidate preferred" and where are you getting those numbers?
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2018, 01:18:00 PM »

In terms of two candidate preferred, California 10 ended up as a comfortable win for the Democrats (around 55-45% 17,500-14,500) while California 39 was a blow out.

what do you mean by "two candidate preferred" and where are you getting those numbers?

Hrm, they must have counted a lot more votes since I last checked.

Rather than looking at all the votes for all the candidates, 'two candidate preferred' means only the candidates in question are looked at (so the Democrat who came in second and the leading Republican.) So this:

Josh Harder: 20,010, 54.2%
Ted Howze: 16,902, 45.8%

https://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-rep/district/10

I'm still confused by your wording but based on your example I think I understand - you're not talking about the election as a whole, but only looking at the 'race' for the second runoff slot, and only comparing the votes of 2nd and 3rd place?

If so that makes sense I think. I'm just used to "two party preferred" as the term is used in Australia, and assumed you meant something similar here (which in California would probably be comparing the total number of Democrat votes with Democrat votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.