Should "Sexters" be Convicted?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:50:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should "Sexters" be Convicted?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Why does this title thing exist?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
#3
Maybe		  
#4
Centrist Meme		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Should "Sexters" be Convicted?  (Read 1347 times)
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 31, 2018, 09:30:32 AM »
I'm going with no, I don't personally see the issue with it. Your body, your choice. If it gets shared and spreads, I'd really only consider convicting the person that shared it.
Logged
kyc0705
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,756


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2018, 10:35:49 AM »
Convicted for doing what, exactly?
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2018, 12:15:19 PM »
Quote from: kyc0705 on May 31, 2018, 10:35:49 AM
Convicted for doing what, exactly?
Often times there are convicted for producing and distributing child pornography (which I think is just ridiculous).
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,343
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2018, 03:32:52 PM »
Quote from: Representative Ninja0428 on May 31, 2018, 12:15:19 PM
Quote from: kyc0705 on May 31, 2018, 10:35:49 AM
Convicted for doing what, exactly?
Often times there are convicted for producing and distributing child pornography (which I think is just ridiculous).
if that's what you wanted to talk about then your OP is just horrible.  You didn't even mention the most important part.  Kill this and start over.
Logged
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,862
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2018, 05:29:19 PM »
No. If you're underage and you're taking pictures of yourself you shouldn't be classified as a child pornographer.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,892
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2018, 06:11:15 PM »
The idea that someone underage can get indicted on child pornography charges for taking a nude pic of themselves and sending it to their bf/gf is patently absurd. States should have corrected this already long ago.
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2018, 02:20:39 PM »
Quote from: Virginia on May 31, 2018, 06:11:15 PM
The idea that someone underage can get indicted on child pornography charges for taking a nude pic of themselves and sending it to their bf/gf is patently absurd. States should have corrected this already long ago.
some pardons are in order
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2018, 04:00:39 PM »
I don't get the premise of charging someone who is underage with child pornography, when they are taking photo/video of themselves.

Charging an adult who takes a picture of a child's privates for the child's benefit is fine, but charging the child is beyond me.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2018, 07:35:15 PM »
People should leave kids anole.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2018, 11:27:27 PM »
Quote from: Virginia on May 31, 2018, 06:11:15 PM
The idea that someone underage can get indicted on child pornography charges for taking a nude pic of themselves and sending it to their bf/gf is patently absurd. States should have corrected this already long ago.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2018, 04:58:50 PM »
What if an underage person is sexting an adult?  Should the adult then be charged with possession of child pornography?
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2018, 10:03:18 PM »
Quote from: Del Tachi on June 11, 2018, 04:58:50 PM
What if an underage person is sexting an adult?  Should the adult then be charged with possession of child pornography?
Depends. If it falls within a Romeo-and-Juliet age provision (I think four years in most instances), then no. If it's like some 40 year old person, they're clearly a predator and then yes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 13 queries.