Why did Carter so well in the South in 1980? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:46:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Carter so well in the South in 1980? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Carter so well in the South in 1980?  (Read 2383 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,717
United States



« on: June 01, 2018, 02:08:07 AM »

Although he lost in a landslide nationwide, Jimmy Carter still came close to winning lots of southern states in 1980. He even overperformed Bill Clinton significantly. I know that there was the regional factor that gave him the 1976 election, but I always believed that Reagan was a very good fit for the South (especially compared to GOP types like Ford or HW pre-1988). Therefore, it's surprising that Reagan just barely managed to win these states despite a nationwide landslide. And John Anderson probably cost Carter more votes than Reagan.

And if you flip all states Reagan carried with less than 50%, Carter wins the election with this map (Carter at 284 EVs):

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.