Places where Perot '92 did better than Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:58:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Places where Perot '92 did better than Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Places where Perot '92 did better than Trump  (Read 760 times)
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


« on: June 12, 2018, 03:00:48 PM »
« edited: June 12, 2018, 03:04:01 PM by mathstatman »

Not on the list are New York County, NY (Trump- 10% vs. Perot 5%) or Philadelphia (I don't think Perot reached 15% in Philly), nor is San Francisco on the list (though it was very close: Trump got 9.2% there vs. 9.0% for Perot).

On the list are Detroit, MI (3.1% Trump vs. 4.0% Perot); Washington, DC (4.0% Trump vs. 4.3% Perot); and Cambridge, MA (6.5% Trump vs. 10.0% Perot--the greatest discrepancy I could find). Two of those three are places I have lived.

Any others? Let's say places with at least 10,000 total votes cast both years. Perhaps in New England or CA or Pac Northwest?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.