NV-Gov (Gravis) Laxalt (R) Leads Sisolak (D) in Close Race

[mds32]

Gravis Marketing
Nevada

Laxalt (R) - 43%
Sisolak (D) - 41%


http://orlando-politics.com/2018/07/02/gravis-marketing-2018-nevada-poll/

[MT Treasurer]

Likely D.

[TheSaint250]

Laxalt doing better than Heller lol

I wonder if there are any Laxalt-Rosen voters or if these voters are just Republicans (it’s probably the latter but still)

[KingSweden]

Laxalt doing better than Heller lol

I wonder if there are any Laxalt-Rosen voters or if these voters are just Republicans (it’s probably the latter but still)

There may be some. The warm glow of Brian Sandoval is probably strong in the Gov race even if Lacalt is a totally different animal

[mds32]

Laxalt doing better than Heller lol

I wonder if there are any Laxalt-Rosen voters or if these voters are just Republicans (it’s probably the latter but still)

There may be some. The warm glow of Brian Sandoval is probably strong in the Gov race even if Lacalt is a totally different animal

Not to mention that Democrats haven't held the NV-Gov mansion for 20 years. That's 20 years of voters in a swing-state that have been voting Republican for Governor.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Likely D.

Tilt R

[Skye]

It's Gravis. But this race is competitive.

[krazen1211]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

[YE]

Laxalt doing better than Heller lol

I wonder if there are any Laxalt-Rosen voters or if these voters are just Republicans (it’s probably the latter but still)

There are probably some in Washoe County.

[ON Progressive]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

[Landslide Lyndon]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

Has your kiddie diddler conceded yet?

[Terry the Fat Shark]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

Actually yeah they did nail the 2016 presidential result in Nevada, so I guess Gravis is the Nevada gold standard

[mds32]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

Gravis Marketing got Nevada correct in 2018 to the letter.

Last poll: 11/3-11/6 45-43 Clinton (Gravis)..... Actual 48-46 Clinton.

For the Senate race it actually OVERESTIMATED the Dems, saying Masto would win by 6. She won by 2 points.

Nice try though.

[ON Progressive]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

Gravis Marketing got Nevada correct in 2018 to the letter.

Last poll: 11/3-11/6 45-43 Clinton (Gravis)..... Actual 48-46 Clinton.

For the Senate race it actually OVERESTIMATED the Dems, saying Masto would win by 6. She won by 2 points.

Nice try though.

The point still stands that if he was a "golden name", he would be up by way more than 2% against someone who likely has lower name recognition.

[mds32]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

Gravis Marketing got Nevada correct in 2018 to the letter.

Last poll: 11/3-11/6 45-43 Clinton (Gravis)..... Actual 48-46 Clinton.

For the Senate race it actually OVERESTIMATED the Dems, saying Masto would win by 6. She won by 2 points.

Nice try though.

The point still stands that if he was a "golden name", he would be up by way more than 2% against someone who likely has lower name recognition.

I am not talking about the Golden Name here. I am pointing out that he was basically saying Gravis Marketing sucked in Nevada and said that they and other's were not predicting the Democratic turnout in the state. You can't disprove what I said here so you have to go back to the "golden name" line I get it.

[Co-Chair Bagel23]

The Laxalt name is gold in Nevada.

So golden, he is only up 2% in a Nevada Gravis poll. Which is a totally accurate pollster in a state with absolutely no polling error that underestimates Dems consistently, right?

Gravis Marketing got Nevada correct in 2018 to the letter.

Last poll: 11/3-11/6 45-43 Clinton (Gravis)..... Actual 48-46 Clinton.

For the Senate race it actually OVERESTIMATED the Dems, saying Masto would win by 6. She won by 2 points.

Nice try though.

The point still stands that if he was a "golden name", he would be up by way more than 2% against someone who likely has lower name recognition.

To be fair, he is THE Steve Sisolak.

[_]

> G R A V I S

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Sisolak, in every poll has underpolled, Rosen, it's safe to say that this race right now, isn't Leaning D, its a tossup

[Progressive Pessimist]

Sisolak, in every poll has underpolled, Rosen, it's safe to say that this race right now, isn't Leaning D, its a tossup

[Maxwell]

Laxalt doing better than Heller lol

that's not altogether too surprising considering Laxalt has been entirely coasting on his grandfather's name his entire career and Dean Heller has been running scared and dumb this whole campaign.

This is an incredibly weak lead for Laxalt considering a lot of pundits have had this race at Lean R.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Adam Laxalt is a mainstream conservative and he has a good chance of winning

[Maxwell]

Adam Laxalt is a mainstream conservative and he has a good chance of winning

incorrect wrong bad horrible this is not correct

[Joe Republic]

The population of Nevada has tripled in size since Paul Laxalt last held office.  That's a lot of people who don't know or care about the Laxalt family name.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Sisolak wasn't a Ross Miller candidate