FL-SEN (Mason Dixon): Scott leads among South Florida Hispanics

[Zaybay]

And pundits thought Crist would beat Scott, this will be a nailbiter, just like that Gubernatorial race.

He almost did, it was one of the closest races on 2014. Saying that Chist would win would be a normal response. Many pundits think Claire is safe, others think Hawley has it, thats what happens with a tossup race.

Though I guess you have been trolling on this entire thread(and website, for that matter), soo, ehh.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

For those wondering, the sample was 54% Cuban.

[Skye]

And pundits thought Crist would beat Scott, this will be a nailbiter, just like that Gubernatorial race.

He almost did, it was one of the closest races on 2014. Saying that Chist would win would be a normal response. Many pundits think Claire is safe, others think Hawley has it, thats what happens with a tossup race.

Though I guess you have been trolling on this entire thread(and website, for that matter), soo, ehh.

What? Which pundit rates McCaskill's seat as Safe?

Also, lol @ wasting your breath with olawakandi.


Anyway, I wouldn't put tooooooo much attention to this poll considering it's polling a  subsample of voters in an area of the state, so it's obvs not going to be too accurate.

[MT Treasurer]

What? Which pundit rates McCaskill's seat as Safe?

Which pundit thinks Hawley "has it"?

[KingSweden]

And pundits thought Crist would beat Scott, this will be a nailbiter, just like that Gubernatorial race.

He almost did, it was one of the closest races on 2014. Saying that Chist would win would be a normal response. Many pundits think Claire is safe, others think Hawley has it, thats what happens with a tossup race.

Though I guess you have been trolling on this entire thread(and website, for that matter), soo, ehh.

I don’t think OC is trolling, I’m almost certain it’s performance art

[Skye]

What? Which pundit rates McCaskill's seat as Safe?

Which pundit thinks Hawley "has it"?

Well, maybe some people agree with those statements above, but they're probably Atlas posters... not sure if that qualifies as 'pundit'? lmao

[2016]

Scott has raised 10,7 Mio $$$ in the 1st Fundraising Quarter. He is IMO running the best Republican Senate Campaign in the entire Nation thus far. It will be very close between him and Nelson in November and Scott has a shot at winning here.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

And pundits thought Crist would beat Scott, this will be a nailbiter, just like that Gubernatorial race.

He almost did, it was one of the closest races on 2014. Saying that Chist would win would be a normal response. Many pundits think Claire is safe, others think Hawley has it, thats what happens with a tossup race.

Though I guess you have been trolling on this entire thread(and website, for that matter), soo, ehh.

Someone whose thinks Dems are gonna win 13 gov mansions shouldnt be calling someone a troll or hack.

[Doimper]

Nelson is going to win by 5, and everyone on this forum will pretend that they saw it coming all along.

[2016]

Nelson is going to win by 5, and everyone on this forum will pretend that they saw it coming all along.

No, he won't win that big. It will be 1-2 Point Race. Watch when Republicans will start coming home in October. Have Democrats won anything meaningful down there beyond Obamas Election wins? No, they haven't. They might not only lose this Race but the Governor Race as well.

[Zaybay]

And pundits thought Crist would beat Scott, this will be a nailbiter, just like that Gubernatorial race.

He almost did, it was one of the closest races on 2014. Saying that Chist would win would be a normal response. Many pundits think Claire is safe, others think Hawley has it, thats what happens with a tossup race.

Though I guess you have been trolling on this entire thread(and website, for that matter), soo, ehh.

Someone whose thinks Dems are gonna win 13 gov mansions shouldnt be calling someone a troll or hack.

1. Im only predicting 11. I just chose D for Alaska, cause I think its likely Walker will be the one to drop out.
2. You, along with Limo and Hofoid, are like the triumvirate of trolls on this forum.
3. You literally are still reiterating that Scott won Hispanics, though multiple posters have disprove it.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Scott, Cramer and Hawley have been leading in polls and its hard to see Dems holding everyone of their seats. If those three Dems were safe, I would say so

[Xing]

Junk. Even if Scott wins, he won’t come close to winning among Latinos.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Junk. Even if Scott wins, he won’t come close to winning among Latinos.

He has a Latino LT Gov Lopz-Cantera

[Zaybay]

Junk. Even if Scott wins, he won’t come close to winning among Latinos.

He has a Latino LT Gov Lopz-Cantera

and he still lost Latinos by a good margin.

[Young Conservative]

If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty terrified that Scott hasn't even tapped into his own fortune yet and he's still outspending Nelson exponentially.

[KingSweden]

If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty terrified that Scott hasn't even tapped into his own fortune yet and he's still outspending Nelson exponentially.

I’m much more concerned about that than this poll, which I’m questionable about

[Zaybay]

If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty terrified that Scott hasn't even tapped into his own fortune yet and he's still outspending Nelson exponentially.

Ehh, money is very useful, but its only up to a point. A candidate having 10 million vs one with 20 million will have no difference in voting numbers, compared to a candidate with 100,000 vs 1 million.
Other factors, such as name rec, and likability, are more influential than money, but money is usually needed to get these known to the public.
Rick Scott is really burning through money, but even if he tapped in to his personal account, it would start to have less and less of an impact. It matters more if Nelson has/uses money at this point, not Rick's accounts.

[UWS]

So if Scott is leading among Hispanics in Southern Florida, I guess Scott might win Miami or just do a strong performance there.

[BudgieForce]

So if Scott is leading among Hispanics in Southern Florida, I guess Scott might win Miami or just do a strong performance there.

Scott isnt coming close to winning Miami.

[UWS]

So if Scott is leading among Hispanics in Southern Florida, I guess Scott might win Miami or just do a strong performance there.

Scott isnt coming close to winning Miami.

Okay so maybe around 45 % for Scott in Miami.

[Zaybay]

Im surprised we are still talking about a flawed poll that polled one specific demographic group in one specific area.

[BudgieForce]

So if Scott is leading among Hispanics in Southern Florida, I guess Scott might win Miami or just do a strong performance there.

Scott isnt coming close to winning Miami.

Okay so maybe around 45 % for Scott in Miami.

Trump won 54% of Cubans in 2016 and still came nowhere near Hillary in Miami-Dade.

[ON Progressive]

So if Scott is leading among Hispanics in Southern Florida, I guess Scott might win Miami or just do a strong performance there.

Scott isnt coming close to winning Miami.

Okay so maybe around 45 % for Scott in Miami.

Trump won 54% of Cubans in 2016 and still came nowhere near Hillary in Miami-Dade.

He actually lost Cubans 50-48 according to the Latino Decisions exit poll.

[Skye]

If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty terrified that Scott hasn't even tapped into his own fortune yet and he's still outspending Nelson exponentially.

Ehh, money is very useful, but its only up to a point. A candidate having 10 million vs one with 20 million will have no difference in voting numbers, compared to a candidate with 100,000 vs 1 million.
Other factors, such as name rec, and likability, are more influential than money, but money is usually needed to get these known to the public.
Rick Scott is really burning through money, but even if he tapped in to his personal account, it would start to have less and less of an impact. It matters more if Nelson has/uses money at this point, not Rick's accounts.

There was a recent investigation that concluded that more advertisement correlates with a higher vote share, though not with increased turnout. And more money = more advertisement.