I’d like to see a court case on whether or not someone can delete their vote and vote again. I have doubts on it but am unsure if there is precedent.
While it would be interesting to see what the outcome is for precedent's sake, fortunately, such a case would not be a deciding factor in this election. Even if Pericles' vote were invalidated in this contest, Section 7 of the Fremont Constitution states that in the event of a tie in final preferences (in this hypothetical w/o Pericles, 11-11), the tie shall be broken in favor of the candidate with "the greatest number of first preferences". In this situation, HenryWallaceVP wins with 11 first preferences to TPH's 10.
It's also worth noting that TPH made a second post in the thread shortly before it closed and then later deleted it. I believe under any definition or situation in which Pericles' vote would be invalidated, so should TPH's.
