New Zealand relies on agricultural resources much more than Atlasia, and it abolished farm subsidies in 1984 without suffering any sort of agricultural downfall while saving federal money.
Agriculture is far more prolific in, say, New Zealand than it is in Atlasia. Because of that, you get a lot of variety in the market. New Zealand does not have the same kind of massive conglomerates that we have here in Atlasia. If the Agroloplies are all that is left, then there really is not much preventing an epidemic from wiping out certain agricultural populations, due to lack of variation in the species and in their locations. Supporting smaller farms gives us, at least, some defense agains this possibility.
Ever heard of insurance?
Ever heard of famine?Scaremongering. If we end subsidies, domestic outputnwill increase, not decrease, and this is a red herring, because it was not what we were talking about. If there are bad weather conditions in a given year we can just buy food from someone else.
Many parts of the world would be having their own suceseful farming if it weren't for ours and EU's subsisides. Fram subsisides kill people in the third world everyday!
[/quote]
This was already discussed, in detail. Pull the subsidies away now would cause millions of deaths, because the people in those regions are not prepared to farm for themselves. We talked this out.
[/quote]
I guess you mean Africa, becuase that's the only World Region I can think off that does not bitch about having no market for their excess output due to EU and US farm subsidies. As for Africa, most of Africa's trade relationships are with the EU, not us, and even if they were, the reason they can't buy food is becuase they are burneded by their own protectionism. Nothing we could do could change that.