Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:18:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate?  (Read 5418 times)
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 14, 2018, 05:17:08 PM »

Both Mike and Tim were pretty much boring non-entities. If someone more exciting and less bland were the VP pick for either side, would it have helped or were Pence and Kaine as good as they could have gotten?
Logged
pikachu
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,202
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2018, 06:55:09 PM »

Imo, VPs can only hurt a candidate, not help one so I don't any realistic veep choice other than Kaine would've done anything for Hillary. Otoh, I think if Trump chose Christie as he originally wanted to, then he would've lost the election. October 2016 was actually a pretty big drip-drip-drip month for bad Bridgegate news (and that was only from NJ media) and I can see that flipping a couple thousand votes if it got a lot more national attention.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2018, 09:30:03 PM »

It's possible that Cory Booker would've helped Hillary with turnout among younger and minority voters.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2018, 10:05:54 AM »

In terms of a national figure, Trump could have chosen Condoleezza Rice (who declined).  It might have flipped NH, and had a slight chance in taking NV.   Susan Martinez could have done the same thing.

Hillary, I might go with Jim Webb, nationally. It would have also have helped in Virginia.  It would look less partizan and might attract some moderates.  Strategically, Bob Casey.  PA has 20 electoral votes.  It could have possibly helped in the close state of WI.  It would attract the people that really don't want Trump, but don't want a liberal.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,243
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2018, 03:02:06 PM »

The Republican ticket really didn't need any extra excitement - the Pence choice was one of the best picks in years (in an objective sense, not trying to claim he's a good person).
Logged
Karpatsky
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2018, 04:12:11 PM »

While he might not have accepted and it's true that it's bad to have the VP overshadow the top of the ticket, I believe Hillary would have done well to choose Bernie as VP.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2018, 07:08:56 PM »

While he might not have accepted and it's true that it's bad to have the VP overshadow the top of the ticket, I believe Hillary would have done well to choose Bernie as VP.
Too old.  Maybe someone like Sherrod Brown.
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,495
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2018, 12:19:07 PM »

A bland pick was right for Trump, to reassure conservatives that if he really failed the country wouldn't devolve into chaos. Pence was a much better option than Gingrich and Christie.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,490
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2018, 10:52:02 PM »

Kaine was overrated as Veep, Perez could of been nominee
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2018, 11:27:16 PM »

How can you get anymore bland than Tim Kaine?
Logged
TPIG
ThatConservativeGuy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 1.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2018, 11:34:18 PM »

Trump benefited from the picking of mild-mannered, old guard Pence; it helped to bring social conservatives and more traditional Republicans out to vote for him and provided a good contrast to Trump's erratic behavior. In Clinton's case though, I think she would have definitely benefited from a more enthusiastic VP pick like Elizabeth Warren or someone of that grain. Hillary already had a problem of coming off as inauthentic, robotic, and cold. Picking someone with similar traits as her VP was a terrible decision.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,099


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2018, 12:36:47 AM »

Trump benefited from the picking of mild-mannered, old guard Pence; it helped to bring social conservatives and more traditional Republicans out to vote for him and provided a good contrast to Trump's erratic behavior. In Clinton's case though, I think she would have definitely benefited from a more enthusiastic VP pick like Elizabeth Warren or someone of that grain. Hillary already had a problem of coming off as inauthentic, robotic, and cold. Picking someone with similar traits as her VP was a terrible decision.

Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,166
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2018, 03:04:18 PM »

Trump benefited from the picking of mild-mannered, old guard Pence; it helped to bring social conservatives and more traditional Republicans out to vote for him and provided a good contrast to Trump's erratic behavior. In Clinton's case though, I think she would have definitely benefited from a more enthusiastic VP pick like Elizabeth Warren or someone of that grain. Hillary already had a problem of coming off as inauthentic, robotic, and cold. Picking someone with similar traits as her VP was a terrible decision.

This. Pence was objectively a very good VP pick. Kaine wasn't.
Logged
Da2017
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,475
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2018, 06:59:39 PM »
« Edited: October 15, 2018, 07:03:24 PM by Da2017 »

Trump benefited from the picking of mild-mannered, old guard Pence; it helped to bring social conservatives and more traditional Republicans out to vote for him and provided a good contrast to Trump's erratic behavior. In Clinton's case though, I think she would have definitely benefited from a more enthusiastic VP pick like Elizabeth Warren or someone of that grain. Hillary already had a problem of coming off as inauthentic, robotic, and cold. Picking someone with similar traits as her VP was a terrible decision.

This. Pence was objectively a very good VP pick. Kaine wasn't.

I think Hillary wanted someone who she could work with and get things done. Kaine might of worked if her public persona was better. There were many better choices. She needed someone young and more dynamic. Some of the others choices might of overshadowed her,but that might be more of a positive than negitive, because the more people are reminded of her, her poll numbers drop.

I think Pence was the best pick for Trump.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2018, 04:14:06 AM »

Pence was a good choice for Trump to bring home the conservative base. Kaine was a total f**k you to progressives.
Logged
Karpatsky
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2018, 09:42:49 AM »

I read somewhere that Vilsack was the #2 choice. With hindsight, I think he would have been much better, though I suppose at the time the Midwest was considered safe and Clinton was focusing on expanding the map in FL, AZ, TX, for which Kaine's Spanish language skill must have been a big plus.
Logged
Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2018, 01:27:32 PM »

How can you get anymore bland than Tim Kaine?
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2018, 12:58:30 AM »

Nope, more likely it would've hurt them.

They needed blandness as a means of proof of being rooted, not being upstaged, and keeping all negative press down...which wouldn't happen with a Biden-Palin-Quayle-kind of pick now would it?

Pence was a better gaslighter though.
Logged
Dukakisite1988
Rookie
**
Posts: 132


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2018, 06:36:16 AM »

Given the problems that Hillary had, perhaps a VP pick that would have taken attention away from her would have helped.

On the other hand, VP picks who get more attention than the presidential nominee often do so for the wrong reasons - see Eagleton, Palin, Quayle.
Logged
Kleine Scheiße
PeteHam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,775
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -1.74

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2018, 08:20:32 PM »

I'm quite certain there are at least two or three million registered Democrats that voted for Tim Kaine for vice president without actually knowing who he is.
Logged
Jags
Rookie
**
Posts: 174


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 21, 2018, 10:16:13 PM »

I read somewhere that Vilsack was the #2 choice. With hindsight, I think he would have been much better, though I suppose at the time the Midwest was considered safe and Clinton was focusing on expanding the map in FL, AZ, TX, for which Kaine's Spanish language skill must have been a big plus.
Lol at picking a white man as VP to pick up latino votes just because he speaks spanish.
Logged
Karpatsky
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2018, 06:16:39 AM »

I read somewhere that Vilsack was the #2 choice. With hindsight, I think he would have been much better, though I suppose at the time the Midwest was considered safe and Clinton was focusing on expanding the map in FL, AZ, TX, for which Kaine's Spanish language skill must have been a big plus.
Lol at picking a white man as VP to pick up latino votes just because he speaks spanish.

Why not? You don't have to look like someone to appeal to them.
Logged
Fuzzy Says: "Abolish NPR!"
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,675
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 23, 2018, 07:55:40 PM »

I'm not certain Hillary would have carried VA without Kaine.

I don't think Kaine was Hillary's problem; the problem was Hillary, period.
Logged
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2018, 07:32:22 AM »

I will always think... that if Hillary had chosen Castro ... or even Booker... that she would have won.  I tweeted when she didn't chosen either of them (particularly Castro)- the it may end up being a sentinel mistake.  Either would have given her campaign the extra nudge to turn out enough minority & youth voters in the Larger cities in the few swing states to make the difference.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 15, 2018, 02:47:26 PM »

Pence was and remains a positive for Trump.

He's the ultimate insurance policy that quells any anxiety the religious right may have over their fundamentally pagan President.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.