A Commonsense Arkansas.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:20:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  A Commonsense Arkansas.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would You Support This Map Over The Current One?
#1
Yes (D)
#2
No (D)
#3
Yes (R)
#4
No (R)
#5
Yes (I/O)
#6
No (I/O)
#7
Undecided
#8
Abstain
#9
They are the same
#10
Other
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: A Commonsense Arkansas.  (Read 994 times)
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 16, 2018, 01:08:38 AM »

Would you support this map over the current one? I definitely would. The representation of the state (most probably 3-1) and pvi of each district is much more logical than the current one, there are no county splits at all, and population deviations are minimal. What do you think Atlas?









Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,661
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2018, 11:09:52 AM »

This would've been the smart thing for Democrats to draw in 2011.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2018, 12:16:21 PM »

This would've been the smart thing for Democrats to draw in 2011.
nah, kinda cuts Ross out of the picture.

here you go-



This is a fair map that dems should have drawn. Saves Ross probably (even Blanche won it IIRC) and the Little Rock District is more dem then it is rn.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2018, 02:36:59 PM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2018, 11:57:50 PM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits

My map splits it into 3 different CD’s, the current one also splits it into 3 different CD’s. At least be upright with it and say the real reason which we both know.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2018, 09:07:14 AM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits

My map splits it into 3 different CD’s, the current one also splits it into 3 different CD’s. At least be upright with it and say the real reason which we both know.

Which is?  The current map is a White Dem gerrymander to prevent a Black Democrat from being elected, but it's possible to correct that with less than 3 splits in the Little Rock metro.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2018, 12:18:50 PM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits

My map splits it into 3 different CD’s, the current one also splits it into 3 different CD’s. At least be upright with it and say the real reason which we both know.

Which is?  The current map is a White Dem gerrymander to prevent a Black Democrat from being elected, but it's possible to correct that with less than 3 splits in the Little Rock metro.

Fair enough, but my map splits little rock metro into 3 parts just like the current map. So that can't be a fair thing to say you would not want this map more than the current one because of that. Because they are the same in that sense. There has to be another reason. Maybe it's because you want a 4-0 map?
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2018, 06:35:01 PM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits

My map splits it into 3 different CD’s, the current one also splits it into 3 different CD’s. At least be upright with it and say the real reason which we both know.

Which is?  The current map is a White Dem gerrymander to prevent a Black Democrat from being elected, but it's possible to correct that with less than 3 splits in the Little Rock metro.

Fair enough, but my map splits little rock metro into 3 parts just like the current map. So that can't be a fair thing to say you would not want this map more than the current one because of that. Because they are the same in that sense. There has to be another reason. Maybe it's because you want a 4-0 map?
The current map is hideous.

I voted for your map, because yours is not hideous.

That doesn't mean your map is a good map.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2018, 08:31:16 PM »

Nah.  The Little Rock metro area has too many unnecessary splits

My map splits it into 3 different CD’s, the current one also splits it into 3 different CD’s. At least be upright with it and say the real reason which we both know.

Which is?  The current map is a White Dem gerrymander to prevent a Black Democrat from being elected, but it's possible to correct that with less than 3 splits in the Little Rock metro.

Fair enough, but my map splits little rock metro into 3 parts just like the current map. So that can't be a fair thing to say you would not want this map more than the current one because of that. Because they are the same in that sense. There has to be another reason. Maybe it's because you want a 4-0 map?
The current map is hideous.

I voted for your map, because yours is not hideous.

That doesn't mean your map is a good map.

See, this is a fair point, thank you.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2018, 05:39:36 AM »

this is a good map.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 14 queries.