Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 20, 2019, 11:39:32 pm
News: 2020 Presidential Predictions (General) are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  TX CBS/YouGov Tracker: Cruz +6
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: TX CBS/YouGov Tracker: Cruz +6  (Read 1491 times)
TheRocketRaccoon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 728
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 07, 2018, 09:45:42 am »

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-races-gop-up-in-texas-tennessee-dems-up-in-arizona-new-jersey-cbs-news-poll/

Cruz 50
O'Rourke 44
Logged
Bagel23
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,203
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2018, 09:46:39 am »

Looks right
Logged
Dr. RI
realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12,225
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.39, S: 4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2018, 09:58:13 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Lean Branson
Doctor Imperialism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2018, 10:06:25 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm pretty surprised that McConnell didn't try stretching the confirmation until November. Republicans will have long forgotten about Kavanaugh by election day.
Logged
KingSweden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,281
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2018, 10:08:07 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm pretty surprised that McConnell didn't try stretching the confirmation until November. Republicans will have long forgotten about Kavanaugh by election day.

Me too.

Interesting as well that there was a net benefit to R interest if he was rejected, as we all suspected.
Logged
For Trump everything, for immigrants the law
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,036
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2018, 10:18:36 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is an actual “reason Democrats lose.” How this spectacle doesn’t get hordes of Democrats off their asses to head to the ballot box with a vengeance is beyond me.
Logged
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,085
Venezuela


Political Matrix
E: 3.29, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2018, 10:21:05 am »

Looks about right.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,686


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2018, 10:37:12 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm pretty surprised that McConnell didn't try stretching the confirmation until November. Republicans will have long forgotten about Kavanaugh by election day.

Me too.

Interesting as well that there was a net benefit to R interest if he was rejected, as we all suspected.

If Kavanaugh had been rejected and Trump had a new nominee up when Election Day came around, it would have been armageddon for Dem chances in the Senate.
Logged
Mondale
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6,550
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2018, 10:43:42 am »

The margin is the same as its been for months but now its due to "Kavanaugh energy"

Next week...it'll be due to Cruz's debate preformance and then a week before election, it'll probably be attributed due to some gaffe Beto makes
Logged
TheRocketRaccoon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 728
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2018, 10:44:25 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm pretty surprised that McConnell didn't try stretching the confirmation until November. Republicans will have long forgotten about Kavanaugh by election day.

This was actually Mitch's original intended play, but Trump being a short-sighted paranoid nut wanted a confirmation ASAP and before midterms.
Logged
DataGuy
Full Member
***
Posts: 217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2018, 10:52:55 am »

But true to form, it looks like FiveThirtyEight has actually increased Beto's chance of winning from 27.9% to 28.6%. They turned Cruz's 6-point lead into a 3.9-point lead and decreased his margin in the polling average. I understand how they did it, but I've been a little skeptical of their methodology.

Sometimes, I think algorithmic complexity can just get in the way of the obvious.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,686


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2018, 10:56:17 am »

But true to form, it looks like FiveThirtyEight has actually increased Beto's chance of winning from 27.9% to 28.6%. They turned Cruz's 6-point lead into a 3.9-point lead and decreased his margin in the polling average. I understand how they did it, but I've been a little skeptical of their methodology.

Sometimes, I think algorithmic complexity can just get in the way of the obvious.

Well, it's not like 27.9% or 28.6% are at all good for Beto.
Logged
DataGuy
Full Member
***
Posts: 217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2018, 11:07:52 am »

True, but I've always found it a little strange that 538 can take a poll that's better than usual for a candidate and turn it into a slight bump for their opponent.
Logged
Sorenroy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,246
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2018, 11:13:16 am »

But true to form, it looks like FiveThirtyEight has actually increased Beto's chance of winning from 27.9% to 28.6%. They turned Cruz's 6-point lead into a 3.9-point lead and decreased his margin in the polling average. I understand how they did it, but I've been a little skeptical of their methodology.

Sometimes, I think algorithmic complexity can just get in the way of the obvious.

I think you're seeing a malicious intent where there isn't one. The reason that it was shifted down to a 3.9% lead is because of YouGov's previously established "House Effects". Essentially, 538 is looking at polls Yougov has done in previous elections and has found that they are, on average, 2.1% too favorable to the Republican candidates. Also, if they were really trying to make it look like O'Rourke was doing better then he actually was, why adjust Public Policy Polling, Quinnipiac University, Reform Austin, etc. away from O'Rourke?

Finally, doesn't it seem naturally counterproductive for a odds website to purposely obfuscate what's going on? From a business perspective, wouldn't that just make them lose traffic? If anything, they should be adjusting toward O'Rourke to make it look like more of a horse race then it actually is.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13,004
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2018, 11:45:11 am »

Believable. Lean R, closer to Likely than Toss-up. It’s going to take a tsunami to flip this.
Logged
Tulsi "Both sides" Gabbard
Cashew
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,079
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2018, 11:51:17 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm pretty surprised that McConnell didn't try stretching the confirmation until November. Republicans will have long forgotten about Kavanaugh by election day.

That's because McConnell is not looking for a partisan advantage, he is simply trying to fulfill his constitutional duty but unfortunately the obstructionist Democrats managed to delay the process, albeit to their own detriment.
Logged
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,702


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2018, 11:57:25 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is an actual “reason Democrats lose.” How this spectacle doesn’t get hordes of Democrats off their asses to head to the ballot box with a vengeance is beyond me.

Its Texas
Logged
For Trump everything, for immigrants the law
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,036
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2018, 11:59:27 am »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is an actual “reason Democrats lose.” How this spectacle doesn’t get hordes of Democrats off their asses to head to the ballot box with a vengeance is beyond me.

Its Texas

And? It's still saying that it made 60% of Democrats more motivated, compared to 73% of Republicans. It would be one thing if this poll said that Kavanaugh had net positive favorability ratings overall, but this is referring to enthusiasm within each party.
Logged
Old School Republican
Computer89
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,702


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2018, 12:01:28 pm »

Concerning Kavanaugh:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is an actual “reason Democrats lose.” How this spectacle doesn’t get hordes of Democrats off their asses to head to the ballot box with a vengeance is beyond me.

Its Texas

And? It's still saying that it made 60% of Democrats more motivated, compared to 73% of Republicans. It would be one thing if this poll said that Kavanaugh had net positive favorability ratings overall, but this is referring to enthusiasm within each party.


Texas Democrats may be more pro Kavanugh comparatively to Democrats Nationally. It wouldnt be surprising, and it would basically be like many North Eastern Republicans being less pro-Kavanugh than Republicans are nationally.
Logged
Senate/SCOTUS/EC Delenda Est 👁
The Impartial Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2018, 12:10:11 pm »

CBS/Yougov is trailer trash even more than Louie Gohmert is, but this is about right. A broken clock is right twice a day and all that.
Logged
DataGuy
Full Member
***
Posts: 217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2018, 12:41:32 pm »

But true to form, it looks like FiveThirtyEight has actually increased Beto's chance of winning from 27.9% to 28.6%. They turned Cruz's 6-point lead into a 3.9-point lead and decreased his margin in the polling average. I understand how they did it, but I've been a little skeptical of their methodology.

Sometimes, I think algorithmic complexity can just get in the way of the obvious.

I think you're seeing a malicious intent where there isn't one. The reason that it was shifted down to a 3.9% lead is because of YouGov's previously established "House Effects". Essentially, 538 is looking at polls Yougov has done in previous elections and has found that they are, on average, 2.1% too favorable to the Republican candidates. Also, if they were really trying to make it look like O'Rourke was doing better then he actually was, why adjust Public Policy Polling, Quinnipiac University, Reform Austin, etc. away from O'Rourke?

Finally, doesn't it seem naturally counterproductive for a odds website to purposely obfuscate what's going on? From a business perspective, wouldn't that just make them lose traffic? If anything, they should be adjusting toward O'Rourke to make it look like more of a horse race then it actually is.

I don't see any malicious intent, it's just that I've found their model to be odd at times. And I've always questioned their use of house effects to adjust polls. House effects evaluate an individual poll against the aggregate of all other polls. For example, a poll that shows R+4 versus a polling average of R+1 has a house effect of R+3. An alternative is to use mean-reverted bias, which evaluates polls against actual election results.

It's actually possible for a pollster to have a house effect in favor of one party while having a mean-reverted bias in favor of the other party. FiveThirtyEight's article on pollster ratings explains it like this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

FiveThirtyEight chooses to use house effects for their model, but I've done my own experimentation and have found that using mean-reverted bias comes up with more accurate results.
Logged
Senate/SCOTUS/EC Delenda Est 👁
The Impartial Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2018, 12:43:33 pm »

According to this poll, Lyin' Ted Cruz is more honest and trustworthy than Beto O'Rourke

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

and...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Penn_Quaker_Girl
Full Member
***
Posts: 134
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2018, 01:10:30 pm »

According to this poll, Lyin' Ted Cruz is more honest and trustworthy than Beto O'Rourke

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

and...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



Because he's a Texas Republican.  And Texas Republicans are God's people.  A man of God couldn't possibly be a liar. 
Logged
History505
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,500
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2018, 05:14:06 pm »

I think it will be Cruz with the edge, but closer than this.
Logged
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,807
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -5.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 07, 2018, 05:50:37 pm »

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC