Thoughts on this? I have been reading a Russian history of Europe, and it makes a big deal out of how Alexander I 'liberated' Europe from Napoleon. Considering though that Napoleon brought rule of law and human rights to the European mainstream, I am not convinced that he could have been worse than the reactionary monarchies which replaced him.
Obviously this is just a hypothetical since he never really had the chance to be a peacetime leader, but I can't help but feel that world freedom and standard of living would be better off had Napoleon maintained hegemony over Europe, at least for a little while.
I would tend to agree, but I don’t know if Napoleon could content himself to stop and play the role of the silent tiger. Napoleon II could, should his father die too soon, fall under the sway of Napoleon’s more able advisers: Fouché, Talleyrand, and Cambacérès.