Opinion of Martin Luther

[Georg Ebner]

As a real roman&reactionary Catholic (preVaticanII) i nontheless admit, that the early LUTHER was theologically very right. But He was (like J.RATZINGER) a naive worldless german professor, who was exploited and abused by the rulers (finally especially by the emerging bourgeoisie), perverted into the contrary: Abandoning celibacy, the monasteries, the sacraments is nothing else than pure pelagianism, an awful atheism of the mediocre rats in the cities, demasked by KIERKEGAARD and NIETZSCHE.

(Remark: Concerning parties&elections or the weather i have opinions - in philosophical&theological issues i haven't.)

[Georg Ebner]

Better than John Calvin (born Jean Cauvin)

That's true.
CALVIN had an incredible memory full of St.AUGUSTINE, but what did it help? As a narrow-minded lawyer (Roman heritage) He perverted PreDestination - originally an expression of confidence to HIS mercy - into a cold&dark mechanistical system. A self-righteous moralistic perfectionism leading to GOD's abdication. A Pelagianism (contrary to the original intention of LUTHER).