538 - Governors Forcast Up
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:51:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  538 - Governors Forcast Up
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 538 - Governors Forcast Up  (Read 1802 times)
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 17, 2018, 12:04:16 PM »
« edited: October 17, 2018, 01:32:21 PM by Gass3268 »

Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2018, 12:05:25 PM »

Predictions?
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,076
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2018, 12:07:46 PM »

Democrats at 23 governorships, Republicans at 27, I am not sure which states will be in which direction.
Logged
American2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,499
CĂ´te d'Ivoire


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2018, 01:21:07 PM »

Logged
Wisconsin SC Race 2019
hofoid
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2018, 01:27:41 PM »

They actually have Cordray about as likely to win as Abrams in Georgia. What a laugh. OH-GOV is gonna be a DeWine slam dunk.
Logged
adrac
adracman42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 722


Political Matrix
E: -9.99, S: -9.99

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2018, 01:27:56 PM »

It's up now.
I'm surprised by the confidence in ME, IA, and especially RI. IA vs WI and RI vs CT relative to each other were also big surprised for me.
Can't wait to see the individual race pages.
Logged
Wisconsin SC Race 2019
hofoid
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2018, 01:30:03 PM »

Too rosy on Dems in the Midwest (look at those Wisconsin, Iowa, and Ohio numbers), but a solid metric otherwise.
Logged
adrac
adracman42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 722


Political Matrix
E: -9.99, S: -9.99

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2018, 01:32:41 PM »

I really like how the focus on population governed, as this is what really matters here. Really puts into perspective how big the Democrat's gains could be.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2018, 01:32:59 PM »

Sad that you can't click on each race to find out what's going on. Especially considering there are some odd results.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2018, 01:37:05 PM »

Probably most surprised by Iowa. I think Hubbell wins, but this seems to be a bit too confident. Everything else looks about right.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2018, 01:40:21 PM »

Probably most surprised by Iowa. I think Hubbell wins, but this seems to be a bit too confident. Everything else looks about right.

I think their "fundamentals" are distorting these results a little too much. Their "lite" version is closer to the results I had in mind, at least at first glance. But maybe that's just me.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,076
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2018, 01:42:28 PM »



Oh, so close, off by decimals. Anyway, similar prediction to what I have, though I am more rosy on OH.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2018, 01:43:05 PM »

Probably most surprised by Iowa. I think Hubbell wins, but this seems to be a bit too confident. Everything else looks about right.

I think their "fundamentals" are distorting these results a little too much. Their "lite" version is closer to the results I had in mind, at least at first glance. But maybe that's just me.

Yet in the "lite" version, Evers' chances go up by 13 points, haha.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2018, 01:48:18 PM »

Probably most surprised by Iowa. I think Hubbell wins, but this seems to be a bit too confident. Everything else looks about right.

I think their "fundamentals" are distorting these results a little too much. Their "lite" version is closer to the results I had in mind, at least at first glance. But maybe that's just me.

Yet in the "lite" version, Evers' chances go up by 13 points, haha.

Considering that model only takes polls into account, and they've mostly been rosy to Evers, I wouldn't expect it any other way.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2018, 01:48:59 PM »

I find some things questionable. While I do think Fred Hubbell will defeat Kim Reynolds, I think that it won't be by 8 points. I think it'll be 5 at most.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2018, 02:00:54 PM »

I agree that their lite model is probably the best (although LOL at NV, and I think a 62% chance for Evers is more realistic than a 74% chance.) IA seems very bullish for Democrats, I'd sooner call it a Toss-Up slightly tilted toward the Democrats.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 17, 2018, 02:03:37 PM »

I agree that their lite model is probably the best (although LOL at NV, and I think a 62% chance for Evers is more realistic than a 74% chance.) IA seems very bullish for Democrats, I'd sooner call it a Toss-Up slightly tilted toward the Democrats.

Actually, 62.45% is far more realistic for Evers. You're way underestimating him
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 17, 2018, 02:13:11 PM »

They have Maine at likely D and place Mills with a 91% chance of winning which seems...generous.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,896
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 17, 2018, 02:13:41 PM »
« Edited: October 17, 2018, 02:49:04 PM by President Johnson »

What? Fred Hubbell has a 84% chance of victory? Seems a bit high. I also don't buy that Janet Mills will end up with 54% of the vote.

Great numbers for Gillum though. Hope Steve Sisolak can also pull ahead, as he is one of my favorite candidates.

The New York prediction also looks great, King Andy almost at 60%.
Logged
American2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,499
CĂ´te d'Ivoire


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 17, 2018, 02:16:49 PM »



Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2018, 02:20:13 PM »

I really like how they make the states not up this year a darker hue of their party's color instead of blanking them out. Makes it much easier to visualize the entire landscape.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 17, 2018, 02:46:28 PM »

This seems mostly right, with the obvious exceptions of Nevada (way too bearish on Sisolak) and Iowa (way too bullish for Hubbell, although I think he will pull it out).
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,896
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 17, 2018, 02:48:39 PM »

This seems mostly right, with the obvious exceptions of Nevada (way too bearish on Sisolak) and Iowa (way too bullish for Hubbell, although I think he will pull it out).

Sisolak is ahead by an inch in the deluxe version, though.
Logged
Scottholes 2.0
Wisconsinite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 905
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 17, 2018, 02:48:51 PM »

Will these ratings be updated? D+2.2 seems really low for WI.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 17, 2018, 02:50:43 PM »
« Edited: October 17, 2018, 02:54:44 PM by ON Progressive »

This seems mostly right, with the obvious exceptions of Nevada (way too bearish on Sisolak) and Iowa (way too bullish for Hubbell, although I think he will pull it out).

Sisolak is ahead by an inch in the deluxe version, though.

That proves my point. Sisolak is not losing or even tied, especially if he's polling better than Rosen.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.