2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:20:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80
Author Topic: 2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 168116 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1925 on: October 04, 2019, 03:32:43 PM »

Fmr. TX-32 Rep. Sessions running for open TX-17

What should we call this phenomenon? The Issa strategy?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1926 on: October 04, 2019, 03:55:40 PM »

Fmr. TX-32 Rep. Sessions running for open TX-17

What should we call this phenomenon? The Issa strategy?

At least Issa was just moving to the district next door in the same county that had territory that was in a prior version of his district. Maybe the Kirkpatrick strategy?
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,694
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1927 on: October 04, 2019, 04:07:45 PM »

Fmr. TX-32 Rep. Sessions running for open TX-17

What should we call this phenomenon? The Issa strategy?

At least Issa was just moving to the district next door in the same county that had territory that was in a prior version of his district. Maybe the Kirkpatrick strategy?

It's awful but nowhere near as bad as in Canada, where politicians parachute into some random riding on the other side of the country to get into parliament.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1928 on: October 04, 2019, 05:27:02 PM »

I want fundraising numbers so bad. I hope people post any they find!
Logged
Lisa's voting Biden
LCameronAL
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.75, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1929 on: October 07, 2019, 12:32:22 AM »

FL-13 out of StPete Polls/Florida Politics, pairing incumbent Charlie Crist against former St. Petersburg mayor Rick Baker.

Charlie Crist (D-inc) - 42% (+7)
Rick Baker (R) - 35%
Undecided - 23%

Trump Approval in FL-13
Approve - 47%
Disapprove - 49% (+2)


https://floridapolitics.com/archives/306726-new-poll-shows-rick-baker-vs-charlie-crist-would-be-closer-race-than-you-might-think
Logged
ltomlinson31
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1930 on: October 07, 2019, 10:40:53 AM »
« Edited: October 07, 2019, 10:57:32 AM by ltomlinson31 »

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/3897137002?__twitter_impression=true

Kelly raised $5.5 million compared to McSally's $3 million and has $9.5 million cash on hand compared to McSally's $5.6 million.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1931 on: October 07, 2019, 12:00:02 PM »

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/3897137002?__twitter_impression=true

Kelly raised $5.5 million compared to McSally's $3 million and has $9.5 million cash on hand compared to McSally's $5.6 million.

How anyone can call this race a Tossup (or even Leaning Republican) presently is beyond me.

Obviously a lot can happen between now and election day, but these fundraising totals combined with McSally's tepid polling are pretty bad early signs for her.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1932 on: October 07, 2019, 12:00:24 PM »

Jim Costa failed to get the CA Democratic Party endorsement.

Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1933 on: October 07, 2019, 12:10:04 PM »

Assorted fundraising numbers for Q3-

IA-01: Ashley Hinson (R) raised $315K, has $492K on hand
IL-06: Jeanne Ives (R) raised $340K
SC-01: Nancy Mace (R) raised $358K, has $452K on hand
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1934 on: October 07, 2019, 01:21:43 PM »

Jim Costa failed to get the CA Democratic Party endorsement.



Incredibly meaningful. Because of how the jungle primary works, endorsements carry far more then their usual milquetoast weight - but only if they are powerful or numerous. Looking at ones voter information guide, seeing a list of 5ish dems and a few GOPers, and one has the endorsement of 20+ people and/or the CADEMs, there is a sort of 'peer-pressure' to go with that politician. You don't want to waste votes and let the GOP get unintended advantages, after all.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1935 on: October 07, 2019, 04:21:25 PM »

Logged
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,513


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1936 on: October 07, 2019, 05:28:04 PM »


So he actually raised 113k and contributed 300k of his own money
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,192
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1937 on: October 07, 2019, 07:45:12 PM »

Yeah, but Atlas told me NJ-2 is a tossup because muh trends and Van Drew underperformed.

Van Drew did underperform (by a good amount) in 2018. He could definitely be saved by very weak opposition but I think considering this and NJ-3 as tossups is reasonable
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,110


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1938 on: October 07, 2019, 07:49:57 PM »

Yeah, but Atlas told me NJ-2 is a tossup because muh trends and Van Drew underperformed.

Van Drew did underperform (by a good amount) in 2018. He could definitely be saved by very weak opposition but I think considering this and NJ-3 as tossups is reasonable

How much was he supposed to win by? He won by 8 points in a district that voted for Trump by 5 points, so the margin over-performance was double digits.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1939 on: October 07, 2019, 08:09:36 PM »

Yeah, but Atlas told me NJ-2 is a tossup because muh trends and Van Drew underperformed.

Van Drew did underperform (by a good amount) in 2018. He could definitely be saved by very weak opposition but I think considering this and NJ-3 as tossups is reasonable

How much was he supposed to win by? He won by 8 points in a district that voted for Trump by 5 points, so the margin over-performance was double digits.

He underperformed his polling (he was leading by around 20% in the two public polls of the race), as well as Obama's 2012 margin in the district despite 2018 being arguably a better year for Democrats than 2012. Not to mention his opponent was triaged by national Republicans and made a bunch of racist comments. A poor opponent combined with Van Drew's moderate record made it seem like he would get a lot of crossover support. In hindsight, it was pretty unlikely that Van Drew would get those kinds of big numbers to begin with (and the 7.7% margin that he won with was a pretty good performance in our current partisan era). However, for the aforementioned reasons, I think a lot of people expected him to do just a little bit better.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1940 on: October 07, 2019, 08:09:57 PM »

Yeah, but Atlas told me NJ-2 is a tossup because muh trends and Van Drew underperformed.

Van Drew did underperform (by a good amount) in 2018. He could definitely be saved by very weak opposition but I think considering this and NJ-3 as tossups is reasonable

How much was he supposed to win by? He won by 8 points in a district that voted for Trump by 5 points, so the margin over-performance was double digits.

The seat was abandoned by the national GOP so everyone expected a blowout. But shocker, the seat was only marginally more favorable for the JVD then the environment and baseline data suggested, because both parties bases are rather loyal these days.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1941 on: October 07, 2019, 08:11:18 PM »

Yeah, but Atlas told me NJ-2 is a tossup because muh trends and Van Drew underperformed.

Van Drew did underperform (by a good amount) in 2018. He could definitely be saved by very weak opposition but I think considering this and NJ-3 as tossups is reasonable

How much was he supposed to win by? He won by 8 points in a district that voted for Trump by 5 points, so the margin over-performance was double digits.

The seat was abandoned by the national GOP so everyone expected a blowout. But shocker, the seat was only marginally more favorable for the JVD then the environment and baseline data suggested, because both parties bases are rather loyal these days.
Yeah the bottom line is that while candidate choice does matter to some degree, there's a limit to how much it will matter.
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1942 on: October 07, 2019, 09:34:22 PM »

Van Drew also didn’t run any negative ads, so I doubt the electorate was as well versed in Grossman’s problems as Twitter nerds were
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1943 on: October 08, 2019, 06:03:00 AM »

Wait, so this district had a PVI of R+21 in 2018 and van Drew won it by 8? That sounds pretty good to me and not as if it was his fault he didn't win it bigger.
Logged
ltomlinson31
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1944 on: October 08, 2019, 08:19:53 AM »

Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,913
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1945 on: October 08, 2019, 08:53:28 AM »

FL-13: Charlie Crist raises $400K, now has $2.6M cash on hand for reelection.

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/307674-charlie-crist-raises-another-400k-for-reelection-campaign
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1946 on: October 08, 2019, 08:58:49 AM »



Porter should run for the Senate whenever Feinstein retires.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,992
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1947 on: October 08, 2019, 10:40:58 AM »



Porter should run for the Senate whenever Feinstein retires.

How about Katie Hill?
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1948 on: October 08, 2019, 11:17:57 AM »

TX-07: Wesley Hunt (R) raised $450K in Q3-

Logged
ltomlinson31
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1949 on: October 08, 2019, 01:29:53 PM »



Lmao
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 11 queries.