WI-Marquette: Tied (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:44:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  WI-Marquette: Tied (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-Marquette: Tied  (Read 9702 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: October 31, 2018, 12:26:48 PM »

But Atlas told me Walker was DOA because of Muhrist.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2018, 12:28:10 PM »

Don't get complacent, Dems. Keep fighting...even when it looks hopeless right now.

Tie = Hopeless?



Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2018, 12:35:34 PM »

If Walker actually wins re-election at the same time that Stabenow/Whitmer/Wolf/Casey landslide, I think that answers the question of which Trump state would be the toughest nut to crack of those three.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2018, 12:39:06 PM »

Hopefully this is the year Marquette's reputation is utterly destroyed.

Selzer is going to be discredited completely this year.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2018, 12:42:09 PM »

Im so confused, Marquette has been given all but one poll saying Walker is leading, and now that their final poll says the race is tied, everyone now things Walker might hold on? Not only is this shift rather good for Evers, as said before, Walker has lead this whole time according to Marquette, but it also means Walker has no polls that show a lead for him anymore(the one that did was Marquette).

Geez, it looks like what's said about Atlas is true, the status of the race is whatever the most recent poll said it was.

I've always thought this was a toss up. I'd still bet on Evers simply due to the national environment though.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2018, 12:52:36 PM »

Hopefully this is the year Marquette's reputation is utterly destroyed.

Selzer is going to be discredited completely this year.

You know, IceSpear, I don't go and dig up every wrong thing you said during 2016, of which there were very many, including your prejudiced railings against the people of West Virginia. I don't because you are such a tedious bore who is not worth a fraction of the effort.

No, the point isn't that you were wrong. The point is you haven't learned a lesson from dismissing a gold standard poll simply because you dislike the result. It's especially strange because this result isn't even particularly bad for the Democrats. Did you seriously think Evers was going to win by double digits? lol
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2018, 01:25:00 AM »

Never doubt the gold standard!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2018, 03:31:53 PM »

Marquette is the last remaining gold standard. Even Selzer was off a decent amount in Iowa.

And yes I know Marquette got 2016 wrong, but I'm not counting it because their final poll was pre-Comey letter. And even despite that they still caught the 11th hour Ron Johnson surge.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 15 queries.