Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 24, 2019, 09:22:01 pm
News: 2019 Gubernatorial Predictions are now active

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  MA: MassInc: Warren +22
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MA: MassInc: Warren +22  (Read 639 times)
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,849
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 01, 2018, 12:34:50 pm »

New Poll: Massachusetts Senator by MassInc on 2018-10-28

Summary: D: 53%, R: 31%, I: 5%, U: 11%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,849
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2018, 12:37:57 pm »

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.
Logged
Calthrina950
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,285
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2018, 12:44:58 pm »

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.

And this is yet another poll showing Warren underperforming Baker, and by a significant margin. 53% vs. 68%? Baker's personal approval ratings seem to be much higher than Warren's, which is not surprising.
Logged
SN2903
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,207
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: 1.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2018, 12:55:55 pm »

 Warren only up 20 or so in ultra liberal Massachusetts is an awful sign for her nationally.
Logged
RoboWop
AMB1996
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,855
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2018, 01:06:21 pm »
« Edited: November 01, 2018, 01:12:09 pm by AMB1996 »

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.

Blame the millions of people who live in Massachusetts and support a thriving economy with multiple in-state media sources.

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.

And this is yet another poll showing Warren underperforming Baker, and by a significant margin. 53% vs. 68%? Baker's personal approval ratings seem to be much higher than Warren's, which is not surprising.

The best part of this is that Democrats thought they had a decent hit on Baker by forcing him to publicly admit he's voting for Diehl.

From the look of current polling, it hasn't put any dent in Baker's extreme popularity while Warren has stagnated and Diehl has ticked slightly up. All they did was make Baker more appealing to conservatives (his worst segment of the electorate) and Diehl more appealing to moderates.

Warren and Baker are still clearly extremely safe, but this should put to bed any hope that Warren will outrun Baker.
Logged
Calthrina950
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,285
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2018, 02:03:02 pm »

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.

Blame the millions of people who live in Massachusetts and support a thriving economy with multiple in-state media sources.

We've gotten more polls of Massachusetts in the last week than polls of Montana, North Dakota, and West Virginia in the last month.

And this is yet another poll showing Warren underperforming Baker, and by a significant margin. 53% vs. 68%? Baker's personal approval ratings seem to be much higher than Warren's, which is not surprising.

The best part of this is that Democrats thought they had a decent hit on Baker by forcing him to publicly admit he's voting for Diehl.

From the look of current polling, it hasn't put any dent in Baker's extreme popularity while Warren has stagnated and Diehl has ticked slightly up. All they did was make Baker more appealing to conservatives (his worst segment of the electorate) and Diehl more appealing to moderates.

Warren and Baker are still clearly extremely safe, but this should put to bed any hope that Warren will outrun Baker.

I fully agree. I think Baker will win ~70-30%, while Warren should win ~60-40%, about the same or maybe slightly better than Hillary Clinton did in 2016.
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 907
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2018, 02:45:47 pm »

Warren only up 20 or so in ultra liberal Massachusetts is an awful sign for her nationally.

I think the “liberalness” of Massachusetts gets exaggerated.

We are overwhelmingly Democratic, yes. So it’s hard for a Republican to win here. But it is more moderate than people give us credit for. Just my two cents
Logged
Lean Branson
Doctor Imperialism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2018, 03:02:08 pm »

I think we could've gotten a few polls with Warren leading by upper single digits during a Clinton midterm.
Logged
Strudelcutie4427
Singletxguyforfun
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,332
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2018, 11:03:31 am »

Chief Shítting Bull with only a +7 favorable rating in PEOPLES TEPUBLIC OF TAXACHISETTS
Logged
AudmanOut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,133
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2018, 06:11:42 pm »

Go Warren!!!
Logged
President Johnson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,534
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2018, 11:11:59 am »

It's really funny that Charlie Baker will outperform her by a substantial margin. I hope Warren doesn't get above 60% because I don't want her to run for president. She may decide against it if her reelection margin isn't too big.
Logged
Calthrina950
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,285
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2018, 12:17:21 pm »

It's really funny that Charlie Baker will outperform her by a substantial margin. I hope Warren doesn't get above 60% because I don't want her to run for president. She may decide against it if her reelection margin isn't too big.

Agreed. And it would be even more embarrassing if Baker crosses the 70% mark while Warren fails to break, or just barely gets above, 60%. Warren should be doing as least as well as Ed Markey, who got 62%, if I am recalling correctly, back in 2014 of all years.
Logged
(CT) The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2018, 01:51:25 pm »

Chief Shítting Bull with only a +7 favorable rating in PEOPLES TEPUBLIC OF TAXACHISETTS


Winner
Logged
Bagel23
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,249
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2018, 03:14:05 pm »

Elizabeth Warren will win, but I'd bet that her mov is going to be fairly pathetic.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC