Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:00:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River  (Read 76835 times)
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« on: January 18, 2019, 07:42:55 PM »

Oops, maybe the red avatars should stop looking to BuzzFeed as a reliable source
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2019, 07:49:22 PM »

Oops, maybe the red avatars should stop looking to BuzzFeed as a reliable source

But the statement doesn't say the report is false.
It pretty much does lol, don't worry you'll get the big bad orange man someday
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2019, 08:00:07 PM »

Oops, maybe the red avatars should stop looking to BuzzFeed as a reliable source

But the statement doesn't say the report is false.
It pretty much does lol, don't worry you'll get the big bad orange man someday

Explain.
The special counsel rarely makes statement's like this, the fact that they have refuted BuzzFeed's story so quickly (not to mention that their are no known sources or corroboration for anything in the article) likely means that the article is quickly put together bs. One of the authors (Leopold) also has a history of making up anonymous sources
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2019, 08:02:00 PM »

Anyways, the original report says the SC's office declined to make a comment. We rarely ever hear from Mueller's team and this statement seems very carefully worded. So in no way is Buzzfeed's story fake news.
Guys; Guys! All we know is that they said "not accurate", that means that the entire story may not be BS! Just most of it!
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2019, 08:17:38 PM »

Oops, maybe the red avatars should stop looking to BuzzFeed as a reliable source

But the statement doesn't say the report is false.
It pretty much does lol, don't worry you'll get the big bad orange man someday

Explain.
The special counsel rarely makes statement's like this, the fact that they have refuted BuzzFeed's story so quickly (not to mention that their are no known sources or corroboration for anything in the article) likely means that the article is quickly put together bs. One of the authors (Leopold) also has a history of making up anonymous sources

1. They didn't "quickly" refute, the story has been out for 22 hours.
2. You're disregarding the wording: "Not accurate" doesn't mean "not true"
3. No he doesn't.

Excuses.
He's going through denial, he really thought they had the big bad orange man this time!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.