Seattle gets its NHL team

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

They should revive the Seattle Metropolitans name so as to already have one Stanley Cup to their credit.

We can call them the Mets.

Anyway, I think that this will work out well. Seattle seems like a decent hockey city (as opposed to Vegas, Phoenix, Tampa, or Miami) and the rivalry with Vancouver will be awesome.

Now when is Wisconsin getting a team?

As soon as Chicago (the city, not the team) moves south.

I mean MKE has a basketball team while Chicago does, too, and its a much better hockey state than basketball.

In fact, MKE has a baseball team and Chicago has TWO.

The NHL has far more Canadian teams than do the other major sports, so that cuts down on how many teams they can field south of the border. If I had to bet on the next US city to get a team, it'd be Houston either by expansion or Arizona moving. Also Milwaukee is too small a metro area to really support two arena teams. If it weren't for the Bucks, then a Milwaukee NHL team would be a no-brainer, but with them, it's just too much potential competition.

[Badger]

They should revive the Seattle Metropolitans name so as to already have one Stanley Cup to their credit.

We can call them the Mets.

Anyway, I think that this will work out well. Seattle seems like a decent hockey city (as opposed to Vegas, Phoenix, Tampa, or Miami) and the rivalry with Vancouver will be awesome.

Now when is Wisconsin getting a team?

As soon as Chicago (the city, not the team) moves south.

I mean MKE has a basketball team while Chicago does, too, and its a much better hockey state than basketball.

In fact, MKE has a baseball team and Chicago has TWO.

The NHL has far more Canadian teams than do the other major sports, so that cuts down on how many teams they can field south of the border. If I had to bet on the next US city to get a team, it'd be Houston either by expansion or Arizona moving. Also Milwaukee is too small a metro area to really support two arena teams. If it weren't for the Bucks, then a Milwaukee NHL team would be a no-brainer, but with them, it's just too much potential competition.

How is a basketball team realistically competition for a hockey team just because they both play in an arena? Totally different fan bases and even demographics.

[OSR stands with Israel]

They should revive the Seattle Metropolitans name so as to already have one Stanley Cup to their credit.

We can call them the Mets.

Anyway, I think that this will work out well. Seattle seems like a decent hockey city (as opposed to Vegas, Phoenix, Tampa, or Miami) and the rivalry with Vancouver will be awesome.

Now when is Wisconsin getting a team?

As soon as Chicago (the city, not the team) moves south.

I mean MKE has a basketball team while Chicago does, too, and its a much better hockey state than basketball.

In fact, MKE has a baseball team and Chicago has TWO.

The NHL has far more Canadian teams than do the other major sports, so that cuts down on how many teams they can field south of the border. If I had to bet on the next US city to get a team, it'd be Houston either by expansion or Arizona moving. Also Milwaukee is too small a metro area to really support two arena teams. If it weren't for the Bucks, then a Milwaukee NHL team would be a no-brainer, but with them, it's just too much potential competition.

How is a basketball team realistically competition for a hockey team just because they both play in an arena? Totally different fan bases and even demographics.

The NBA Team would be way way more popular .



I think the Clippers should relocate to Seattle (It’s not like anyone in LA would care , it’s the Clippers lol)

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

How is a basketball team realistically competition for a hockey team just because they both play in an arena? Totally different fan bases and even demographics.

How quaint.  You think knowledgeable fans in the seats are where the money is. It's the merchandise, the corporate sponsorships, etc. That really matter.  A business might sponsor a family night for its employees at either basketball or hockey as a way of relieving February tedium, but not both. The amount of local money that is spent on sports won't go up that much because a new sport comes in. The greater Milwaukee metro area only has around 2 million people and anyone who's an ice hockey fan instead of a Milwaukee fan still has either the Blackhawks or the Admirals.

Incidentally, Nate Silver did an analysis of where there are unserved NHL fans back in 2013.  The numbers don't look good for Milwaukee getting a team anytime soon.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-cant-canada-win-the-stanley-cup/

If the NHL ever does expand to 36 teams, I'd say the four additional teams would be:
Quebec City
Houston
Halifax, Saint John, or Saskatoon
Cleveland or San Diego

Milwaukee would need the NHL to expand to 40 teams to have a reasonable chance of getting an NHL team.