McGovern Pulls it off in 72'
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:47:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  McGovern Pulls it off in 72'
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McGovern Pulls it off in 72'  (Read 480 times)
No War, but the War on Christmas
iBizzBee
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,896

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 17, 2018, 05:00:16 AM »

This really isn't as unlikely as people think. What if Watergate or a similar scandal had broken much earlier? How would things be different today if the very left-wing George McGovern had become President? How would the immediate withdraw from Vietnam, the radical expansion of the Great Society and the significantly more left-wing American foreign policy affect the world?
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,729
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2018, 05:22:17 PM »

The U.S. withdraws from Vietnam, & all of Southeast Asia goes communist. Japan & NATO make side deals w/ the Soviet Union as the U.S. disarms in the name of peace. As the Soviets begin to take advantage of the power vacuum, the U.S. economy is hit w/ hyperinflation due to McGovern's socialist economic theories. McGovern is defeated in a landslide in 1976 by Ronald Reagan.

Tongue

In actuality, yeah, though, it really is as unlikely as people think.

Nixon was a cynic & a criminal, but he had astutely pivoted on foreign policy: making token troop withdrawals from Vietnam, hinting at negotiations w/ Hanoi, launching the opening to what he used to call Red China, pursuing detente w/ the Soviets. The war raged on, but w/ fewer American, if not Vietnamese, casualties. Nixon's standing (not to mention the Eagleton fiasco) just showed too much of a good deal in the way of McGovern winning, plain & simple. Hence why he was duly crushed.

And just to be clear, Nixon wasn't invincible per se in 1972. It's just that no matter how you slice it, McGovern wouldn't have been the candidate to beat him. You'd need somebody competent, like Humphrey or Muskie, as the Democratic nominee to topple him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 13 queries.