Kentucky 2003 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:51:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Kentucky 2003 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Kentucky 2003  (Read 27897 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« on: November 16, 2003, 11:58:21 PM »

I can explain what happened in Kentucky in 1999.

Peppy Martin was shunned by the Republican establishment because she was a loose cannon - in addition to being not conservative enough to appease Republican leaders. The party didn't want to spend money on her campaign, since they knew she was going to lose anyway.

The reason she carried several heavily Democratic counties is that coal miners there were angry about Paul Patton's "reform" of the workers comp system.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2003, 01:49:44 PM »

I don't know what the deal with West Virginia was. I was told that the United Mine Workers endorsed Buchanan for President, but I have no idea what led them to do that. Nader would have been a much better choice. (He was popular among industrial workers elsewhere.)
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2003, 11:55:04 PM »

The 2000 "election" was a paradox.

The most economically depressed areas trended Republican, while economically prosperous areas trended Democratic.

It made no sense whatsoever.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2003, 03:09:22 PM »

I think the states such as Virginia that are full of new suburbs are going to be the only ones trending Republican in 2004. Nouveau riche suburbanites are a natural New Right constituency, and the Democrats would just be alienating everyone else by trying to please them. (Clinton's support for school uniforms was a good example of this.)

Let's face it: Poor rural and central city voters such as myself really are quite different from the new brand of conservatives who you hear on Fox News Channel and talk radio. We're part of a whole different America from the one the New Right resides in.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.