Under AOC/Bernie-style American socialism, would rich people still be rich? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:54:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Under AOC/Bernie-style American socialism, would rich people still be rich? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Under AOC/Bernie-style American socialism, would rich people still be rich?  (Read 28003 times)
Vittorio
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 475
« on: July 19, 2019, 11:12:49 PM »
« edited: July 19, 2019, 11:18:35 PM by Vittorio »

Under AOC/Bernie-style capitalism, the American proletariat would subsidize the college careers of the children of the American petit-bourgeois while the haute-bourgeois gets to shift the burden of paying for insurance onto the State. Everyone... wins?

You don't get it SNJC, Progressivism in America is not Communism,

It certainly isn't. Case in point:

They'd be richer from all the money saved just letting the government do what it was tasked with doing.

Marx knows all about this.

Quote
A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society. To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.

...

A second, and more practical, but less systematic, form of this Socialism sought to depreciate every revolutionary movement in the eyes of the working class by showing that no mere political reform, but only a change in the material conditions of existence, in economical relations, could be of any advantage to them. By changes in the material conditions of existence, this form of Socialism, however, by no means understands abolition of the bourgeois relations of production, an abolition that can be affected only by a revolution, but administrative reforms, based on the continued existence of these relations; reforms, therefore, that in no respect affect the relations between capital and labour, but, at the best, lessen the cost, and simplify the administrative work, of bourgeois government.

Imagine wanting to sell social reform for no other reason than to sell social reform, heedless of the actual end aimed at by it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.