S.18.4-39: Boring Legal Stuff Act - Statute (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:24:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S.18.4-39: Boring Legal Stuff Act - Statute (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S.18.4-39: Boring Legal Stuff Act - Statute  (Read 745 times)
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« on: January 07, 2019, 07:50:24 PM »

1. Is a really stupid obsolete way that land can be owned by a family and then reverts back to the heirs of the original owner if the first family all die out. Archaic and should be stricken from the books, even if no one functionally does this anymore.

2. Sets a fair statute of limitations on regional products liability lawsuits against airplane manufacturers at 10 years or longer if agreed to by contract.

3. Lets landowners impound their neighbors cattle if the neighbor doesnt fix the fence the cattle crashed through

4. This one is weird for me because Virginia is one of like 4 states to use this rule, the other 3 being in the south as well. Basically if both parties in an accident were being negligent, neither can sue for anything. So if person A was speeding 6 or 7 miles above the speed limit, and Person B runs a red light while looking at her phone while fleeing a hit and run, Person A cant sue Person B if Person B crashes into them. 46 States calculate the percentage at fault each party is and adjust damages accordingly. Under the new system I am proposing we adopt, Person A could sue Person B and probably recover 90% of their damages.

5. Allows defendants to raise a self defense argument in court in situations where the defendant did not run away from their home or a public place respectively.

6. Makes it very hard for trespassers to sue you for hurting themselves while trespassing. An attempted burglar should not be able to sue his victim for having dug holes in the backyard without providing a light. I did however leave in the common law rule preventing "attractive nuisances" which are basically dangerous things that dumb kids mess with. The typical example is swimming pools where a lack of fencing can be viewed as negligent if a small neighborhood child trespasses and drowns because the pool was not fenced off.

7. Provides a quick way for business defendants to dismiss bogus lawsuits filed by idiots who claim seeing transgender persons in the bathroom caused the trauma or pain or some other bullsh**t. After Target allowed transpeople to use the bathroom of their choice in the store, several dingbats tried to sue Target because they claimed fear/shock/anguish/pain/emotional and physical problems. The courts should not be abused with fake harassing lawsuits.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2019, 05:52:03 PM »

This wont require an amendment or stopping the motion, but I noticed I made a typo in # 7. It says "based on of mental" instead of "based on mental". Mr speaker or deputy speaker, would either of you please use your power to fix typos to delete the unintended "of"? Thanks.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.