Why were so few tall buildings built in the 1950s? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:26:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Why were so few tall buildings built in the 1950s? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were so few tall buildings built in the 1950s?  (Read 314 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


« on: February 06, 2019, 10:10:39 PM »

Skyscrapers only make economic sense when land costs are high.  The rise of the automobile in the post war years reduced the value of being in the urban core by making transportation easier.  Between the depression and the war, the number of automobiles in this country was pretty much static between 1929 and 1945, with a little over 23 million in 1929 and a little under 26 million in 1945.  By 1955 there were over 52 million on the road and by 1965 there were over 75 million.

Call it sprawl if you will, but the ease of transportation made skyscrapers less attractive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.