Unearthed audio of Tucker Carlson defending paedophilia etc. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:11:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Unearthed audio of Tucker Carlson defending paedophilia etc. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Unearthed audio of Tucker Carlson defending paedophilia etc.  (Read 2219 times)
Koharu
jphp
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.35

« on: March 11, 2019, 06:28:22 AM »

🤮🤮🤮
Logged
Koharu
jphp
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.35

« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2019, 03:14:43 PM »

If you think the majority of girls getting married at 16 truly want to be married to the person they're being married off to, I've got some ocean-side property to sell you up here in Wisconsin.

Child marriages especially over the last 20 years, are ones forced by families with various motives, whether it be due to a child's conception, religious leanings, or various other "reasons." These young women are being forced into relationships that are harmful for them, and while the "spouse" might be required to provide food and shelter, that doesn't make it "better" than any other type of pedophelia. In fact, the abuse that young women often experience when forced into (or 'talked into') marriage at such a young age is absolutely reprehensible.

Neither is better or worse. They are both traumatic and disgusting, and trying to say that one is "better" than the other is disgusting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

So, while he perhaps wasn't straight-up defending it, it's still disgusting to imply that there's less injury or something when it happens to involve a magical piece of paper that the girl likely didn't choose on her own.
Logged
Koharu
jphp
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.35

« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2019, 04:47:07 PM »

Could we also not call people who are sexually attracted to 16 year olds pedophiles, please?

A pedophile in medical/psychiatric terms is someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent kids, not to 16 year olds who in any biological sense are adults, if not in a mental sense.

Child marriages also happen with children younger than puberty. Not as commonly now, thanks to newer laws, but it still happens. Statutory rape is also still a thing, and that applies in these situations (obviously this is not a discussion about children of the same age marrying, which is a different issue). It may not be straight-up pedophilia, but taking advantage of a minor, whether it be a prepubescent one or not, is disgusting, and the trauma associated with child marriage is real. Neither it nor "normal" pedophilia is acceptable, and pretending one is less worse than the other, as if these things can be rated, is really just awful. A traumatized and abused young adult or child is a traumatized and abused young adult who will be dealing with the abuse and fallout for the rest of their life. In the case of children married to adults, it's possible they may have to endure the rape and abuse for years before they have the means and self-esteem to escape, if they are able to.

So, yeah, maybe young women being married off after their breasts grow in aren't targets of pedophilia in the strictest "medical" sense, but it's still disgusting, and trying to excuse it in any way is just, well, like I said earlier: 🤮🤮🤮
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.