If Scalia died a year earlier
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:37:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  If Scalia died a year earlier
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Scalia died a year earlier  (Read 738 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 19, 2019, 04:02:11 PM »

Would the Republicans still have blocked any Supreme Court nominee by Barack Obama if Antonin Scalia died in February 2015 instead of 2016? Just a month after they took control of the senate.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,405


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2019, 04:40:09 PM »

The Republicans would have blocked any Supreme Court nominee by Barack Obama if any Justice had died or retired at any point at which they had a Senate majority.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2019, 05:34:30 PM »

The Republicans would have blocked any Supreme Court nominee by Barack Obama if any Justice had died or retired at any point at which they had a Senate majority.

Obama would have attempted a recess appointment. It was an election year in 2016; as a result, outcome would have nulified recess appointment. Having a recess appointment im Garland, would have improved Clinton chancea, on gun background checks
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2019, 09:54:38 AM »

Garland would be narrowly confirmed, 51-49. Collins, Murkowsksi, Kirk, Portman, and Ayotte flip. Heller, Corker, Alexander, Flake, McCain, Graham, Toomey, and Rubio are maybes.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2019, 02:26:46 PM »

Obama would probably nominate Garland or someone like him. He was, after all, intended to be a "compromise" nominee, easier for the GOP, or their crucial swing Senators, to swallow. There was no chance for confirming any more liberal nominee.

That's why I opposed the notion of Clinton renominating Garland if elected.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,700
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2019, 04:00:08 PM »

It's impossible to know. At the very least, the GOP wouldn't be able to point to coincidental historical precedent, since they would not be able to not count Kennedy as a late appointment by saying "well the vacancy came open in '87, doesn't matter that he was technically confirmed in '88" (yes they literally used that line many times). I could possibly see a hearing being held, but I doubt there would be a floor vote. Also, this is impossible as the 60 vote rule was still a thing in 2015:

Garland would be narrowly confirmed, 51-49. Collins, Murkowsksi, Kirk, Portman, and Ayotte flip. Heller, Corker, Alexander, Flake, McCain, Graham, Toomey, and Rubio are maybes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.