More embarrassing Dem loss: FL-2018 or WI-2019
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:36:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  More embarrassing Dem loss: FL-2018 or WI-2019
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What loss was more embarrassing for Democrats?
#1
Florida Gov/Sen 2018
 
#2
Wisconsin SC in 2019
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 109

Author Topic: More embarrassing Dem loss: FL-2018 or WI-2019  (Read 1892 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,948
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 03, 2019, 12:09:41 PM »

Which race that should have been a shoo-in for Democrats but was narrowly won by the GOP was more embarrassing? The Florida gubernatorial and Senate races in 2018 or the Wisconsin Supreme Court election of 2019?
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2019, 12:14:19 PM »

The one with normal levels of election turnout.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2019, 12:44:47 PM »
« Edited: April 03, 2019, 01:20:19 PM by NV less likely to flip than FL »

The one in which an incumbent napped until September and lost at the same time as several Democratic incumbents and even challengers in more hostile territory won. Special elections are kind of crapshoots when it comes to predicting turnout. There's no reason Nelson should have lost in a D+8 midterm.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2019, 12:57:37 PM »

the one that actually matters lmao
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2019, 12:59:48 PM »

Florida for sure, lol.
Logged
😥
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,510
Ukraine
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2019, 01:30:04 PM »

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,640
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2019, 01:34:45 PM »

Florida easily.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2019, 01:45:09 PM »
« Edited: April 03, 2019, 01:50:27 PM by Let Dogs Survive »

Florida, because Nelson really had no excuse to do so terribly. Even when considering the natural GOP tilt, or how pretty much everyone except Nikki Fried struggled.

If you removed Nelson from the equation, I'd have to give it a coin flip though.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2019, 01:46:23 PM »

Florida. This year's race can easily be explained away by several different factors all having to do with off-year dynamics. Florida's elections had high turnout in a Dem wave and they still lost.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,323
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2019, 02:48:10 PM »

Florida, because they were expected to win it, and it really lowers 2020 expectations


WI was just a reversion to the norm of a swing state,after showing signs of Tilting D
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,640
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2019, 03:21:13 PM »

Easily WI-2019. The fact that they couldn’t win statewide in a Trump +<1 #resistance state with special election turnout and a massive financial advantage in their favor is embarrassing.

Neubauer lost by 0.5% in an election with ~25% turnout.   There was nothing all that bad about that loss at all.   It was just a normal tight election that just so happen to go to the Republicans.
Logged
Duke of York
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,944


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2019, 03:39:15 PM »

Easily WI-2019. The fact that they couldn’t win statewide in a Trump +<1 #resistance state with special election turnout and a massive financial advantage in their favor is embarrassing.

Neubauer lost by 0.5% in an election with ~25% turnout.   There was nothing all that bad about that loss at all.   It was just a normal tight election that just so happen to go to the Republicans.

I agree and to overanalyze it to say the state is safe R in 2020 is ludicrous
Logged
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2019, 04:08:13 PM »

I still think a number of R losses last year were more embarrassing than either of these, but Wisconsin-2019 of these two. Florida is a less elastic state and was during a polarizing midterm, while Wisconsin is a swinger state with a stronger Dem tradition.
Logged
Peanut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,105
Costa Rica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2019, 04:42:16 PM »

The one in which an incumbent napped until September and lost at the same time as several Democratic incumbents and even challengers in more hostile territory won. Special elections are kind of crapshoots when it comes to predicting turnout. There's no reason Nelson should have lost in a D+8 midterm.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2019, 06:23:37 PM »

Imo, the FL-Sen loss is the most embarrassing Democratic loss since Martha Coakley left office.

An incumbent senator losing a swing state during a midterm of the opposite party's presidency just shouldn't happen.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2019, 11:24:36 PM »

Imo, the FL-Sen loss is the most embarrassing Democratic loss since Martha Coakley left office.

An incumbent senator losing a swing state during a midterm of the opposite party's presidency just shouldn't happen.

I would argue that Florida is a red state masquerading as a swing state. To be a true swing state both parties need to show they can win at least some high profile races. FL Dems haven’t been able to do that since 2012. They have a worse statewide track record of late than MO/MT/WV/KY Dems and we’re not calling those swing states.
I agree. A close margin does NOT mean a race is always a tossup race. Florida has a slight but incredibly inelastic GOP lean.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,474
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2019, 11:43:08 AM »

FL due to fact Nelson underestimated Scott and polls showed Gillum beating Desantis so bad. It was an embarrassing loss to 2 underdogs
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,974


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 07, 2019, 06:31:46 AM »

Florida easily.  In a Democratic year, they should have won both the governorship and Senate seat.   But Gillum was a lousy candidate, and Nelson completely underestimated Scott.
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,186
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 07, 2019, 01:38:37 PM »

The one in which an incumbent napped until September and lost at the same time as several Democratic incumbents and even challengers in more hostile territory won. Special elections are kind of crapshoots when it comes to predicting turnout. There's no reason Nelson should have lost in a D+8 midterm.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,034
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 07, 2019, 02:22:02 PM »

The one in which an incumbent napped until September and lost at the same time as several Democratic incumbents and even challengers in more hostile territory won. Special elections are kind of crapshoots when it comes to predicting turnout. There's no reason Nelson should have lost in a D+8 midterm.

Plus Democrats would have had a much easier road to taking back the Senate in 2020 had Nelson held on.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 07, 2019, 03:17:42 PM »

Florida, I still remember when red avatars insisted that it was impossible for Bill Nelson to lose to Rick Scott
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,406
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 07, 2019, 07:58:19 PM »

The one in which an incumbent napped until September and lost at the same time as several Democratic incumbents and even challengers in more hostile territory won. Special elections are kind of crapshoots when it comes to predicting turnout. There's no reason Nelson should have lost in a D+8 midterm.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 14 queries.