Two of these decade's most embarrassing loses came from Martha Coakley's stunning loss to Scott Brown in Massachusetts and Roy Moore's shocking defeat in Alabama by Doug Jones. Both candidates began the campaign with double digits leads, but numerous missteps led to their lead to evaporate. Who wins the battle of humiliated losers
I think Coakley easily, because Moore is literally the worst candidate ever, but her campaigning is terrible, but so is Moore's
My guess:
Coakley's terrible campaigning costs her some less racially diverse states, that she should win, meanwhile Moore's rhetoric costs him the diverse states in the Sun Belt and South, and minority turnout skyrockets, SC, LA, and MS are all within 5 points, but Coakley's campaigning makes her underperform in flyover country
Post yours below
