2008 : Clinton/Rendell vs McCain/Lieberman (there's no recession)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:10:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2008 : Clinton/Rendell vs McCain/Lieberman (there's no recession)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2008 : Clinton/Rendell vs McCain/Lieberman (there's no recession)  (Read 573 times)
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,241


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 06, 2019, 07:23:44 PM »
« edited: May 06, 2019, 07:27:24 PM by UWS »

How would it look like? What would be the electoral college map in such scenario?
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,752


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2019, 12:32:48 PM »



Clinton/Rendell 286
McCain/Lieberman 252
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2019, 02:07:24 PM »

Recession or not, the Republican base simply isn't going to accept Joe Lieberman as McCain's VP. Conservative turnout plummets and Clinton comfortably wins. With a recession, this would be complete blowout.

Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,752


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2019, 08:36:19 PM »

Recession or not, the Republican base simply isn't going to accept Joe Lieberman as McCain's VP. Conservative turnout plummets and Clinton comfortably wins. With a recession, this would be complete blowout.



The GOP base hates Hillary that much and also Hillary wouldn’t win TN even with the crash let alone without it and probably not KY either . With the crash the only southern states she wins are AR, WV, FL and VA while without the crash it’s probably only AR
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2019, 09:15:38 PM »

Recession or not, the Republican base simply isn't going to accept Joe Lieberman as McCain's VP. Conservative turnout plummets and Clinton comfortably wins. With a recession, this would be complete blowout.



The GOP base hates Hillary that much and also Hillary wouldn’t win TN even with the crash let alone without it and probably not KY either . With the crash the only southern states she wins are AR, WV, FL and VA while without the crash it’s probably only AR

Voters in these states had not become integrated with the GOP base yet. Plus she was doing well in the polls in Clinton 92/96 southern states prior to the recession and McCain’s picking of Joe Lieberman in this timeline. Again I think even someone like Palin would be far more suitable for the GOP electorate at this point. Conservatives end up staying home and Hillary picks up PUMA Dems all over the South.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,752


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2019, 09:18:41 PM »

Recession or not, the Republican base simply isn't going to accept Joe Lieberman as McCain's VP. Conservative turnout plummets and Clinton comfortably wins. With a recession, this would be complete blowout.



The GOP base hates Hillary that much and also Hillary wouldn’t win TN even with the crash let alone without it and probably not KY either . With the crash the only southern states she wins are AR, WV, FL and VA while without the crash it’s probably only AR

Voters in these states had not become integrated with the GOP base yet. Plus she was doing well in the polls in Clinton 92/96 southern states prior to the recession and McCain’s picking of Joe Lieberman in this timeline. Again I think even someone like Palin would be far more suitable for the GOP electorate at this point. Conservatives end up staying home and Hillary picks up PUMA Dems all over the South.

Bill barely won KY and TN in 1996 , by 2008 a Dem would not have won those states
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2019, 09:59:19 PM »

Recession or not, the Republican base simply isn't going to accept Joe Lieberman as McCain's VP. Conservative turnout plummets and Clinton comfortably wins. With a recession, this would be complete blowout.



The GOP base hates Hillary that much and also Hillary wouldn’t win TN even with the crash let alone without it and probably not KY either . With the crash the only southern states she wins are AR, WV, FL and VA while without the crash it’s probably only AR

Voters in these states had not become integrated with the GOP base yet. Plus she was doing well in the polls in Clinton 92/96 southern states prior to the recession and McCain’s picking of Joe Lieberman in this timeline. Again I think even someone like Palin would be far more suitable for the GOP electorate at this point. Conservatives end up staying home and Hillary picks up PUMA Dems all over the South.

Bill barely won KY and TN in 1996 , by 2008 a Dem would not have won those states

I agree TN would’ve been difficult but I think Hillary would’ve done solid in KY. KY Dems were dominant on the state level and actually had quite the resurgence during W’s presidency. Either way, McConnell might actually go down in the concurrent senate elections, which would otherwise go much better for th Republicans in this timeline.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,689
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2019, 02:25:12 AM »
« Edited: May 14, 2019, 02:44:54 AM by Sir Mohamed »



✓ Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY)/Governor Ed Rendell (D-PA): 325 EVs.; 50.8%
Senator John McCain (R-AZ)/Senator Joe Lieberman (R-CT): 213 EVs.; 47.2%


Clinton wasn't going to win AR in 2008. CO and NV are tough calls, I'd give them to Clinton narrowly.


Foot note: The PA governorship would have gone to the GOP with Ed Rendell resigning to become VP. He had a Dem lt. gov. (Catherine Baker Knoll) who passed away days after the presidential election and the Senate pro tem was a GOPer.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.