I would like to clarify that I am not asking the justices to discipline the above users, they may choose to or choose not to, that is the justices' prerogative. I am asking the justices to issue a sweeping ruling on the unregulated off-site chatroom called Discord, I would like for them to clarify what can and cannot be posted there, and create a formal ruling on what exactly can be transferred from Discord to Atlas
Well, it is my belief that we already have a clear law regarding Discord and what people can and can't post there.
Article I.2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Atlasia
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, nor of the press, nor withholding the freedom to peaceably assemble and to petition for the redress of grievances.
I'm pretty sure that basically anything that isn't related to legislation is able to be posted on Discord and well within the confines of free speech. At least under the current law (maybe if that Discord bill had passed, you would be able to sue based on that bill for harrassment or libel)
The case
People of the Republic of Atlasia v. Ninja0428 is also a Discord-related case (the only one to my knowledge). Since it was a criminal case and not one related to legislation, we didn't get any statements from the justices, but still does set the precedent that talking about stuff in Discord is definitely legal.
I will ask you again, which law were we allegedly breaking by talking in Discord? Here's a copy of the Criminal Justice Act, as posted by the Attorney General:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=315530.msg6706400#msg6706400You also have the Constitutions of Lincoln and Atlasia in the Wiki as well as their statute.