Sorry for the delay.
1 - Things can be park rules without being crimes. Using the wrong sink should not carry criminal penalties.
2 - I think compelled speech should be minimized whenever possible. This is an unnecessary forced statement and the government should avoid that when it can especially when criminal penalties are involved.
3 - So Im weird and sometimes read through public comments filed for proposed federal rules. This dumb reg came up because certain gaming websites set up safeguards to comply with federal law on websites in which children known to be under 14 played and those safeguards included permanently disabling chat functions with adult accounts. When kids with junior accounts grow up there is no mechanism to certify that they arent babies anymore so certain account features are denied them unless they create a new account and forfeit their data. This is to let websites know that they are permitted to unlock the features on junior accounts upon reaching 14.
4 - restores the legally correct definition of joint employer that some dumb bureaucrats got mixed up
5 - I really find the whole corpse desecration thing that some people get into disturbing. Its basically just spite, so this change will remove a disturbing, spiteful law that demands we dig up corpses out of the cemetery and chuck them off our land when we find out way after they've been buried that they did something bad.
6 - This does what is says. It makes it a crime if your hybrid isn't loud enough.
7 - This is not about health and safety.
8 - Discussed above
9 - Discussed above
10 - Was not discussed above but the argument for 9 is identical for fax machine messages
11 - It should not be a federal crime for teachers to leave graded student work in convenient unattended pickup locations.
12 - Any risk of hearing loss is due to the volume of the TV/Speakers playing the video, not the volume at which the video is recorded. This is a dumb thing to police and touches again on free speech.
13 and 14 - So Im not saying we should get rid of the Lacey act or anything, its important to protect animals. 10 years ago, citing the Lacey Act armed federal law enforcement shut down work at a Gibson guitar factor over the lumber. The Lacey Act just requires that a foreign law not have been fully complied with. It is not limited to conservation laws. If your wood export from India is supposed to have had a red tag but instead had a yellow tag, some federal bureaucrats have interpreted that as requiring the Atlasian government to enforce minor Indian (and every other country) paperwork and export regulations that have nothing to do with conservation against Atlasians on Atlasian soil. These changes will prevent future excesses.
15 - arcane and unnecessary
16 - The federal government shouldnt care what horses do in their downtime
17 - Im cheating a little with this one. This bans gag clauses in pharmacy contracts that prevent dispensers from mentioning when paying cash would be cheaper than insurance.
18 - Im fine with firing a chronically late employee but criminal penalties is absurd for someone whose job is selling water
19 - Some people may want specific spice distributions in their cheese. The federal government should be regulating our taste buds.
20 - This eliminates the dumb cell tower siting preemption rule passed under the Ajit Pai FCC recently that totally cut localities out of discussions on where cell towers can be built.
21 - Discussed Above.
22 - Discussed Above.
23 - These are legacy regs from like 100 years ago and they unfairly freeze some workers out of federal contracts.
24 - Devolves control over security of private non-federal property to localities.
25 - Lifts a rule to help the Post Office operate in the black.
26 - Eliminates a stupid federally imposed dress code on actors, cosplay, and sexplay in private settings.
27 - This would be more convenient for the passenger and give advanced notice to AMTRAK workers
28 - As unpopular as it sounds, free speech protects anonymous speech and I would argue recorded speech. The proposed change protects free speech.
29 - Ditch the Jones Act once and for all. Its just corporate welfare.
30 - Discussed Above. This is the one everyone will probably want to remove.
31 - Fixes the allowable ozone NAAQS at a single level to allow for easier planning for attainment.
32 - Basically to restore this ruling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailey_v._United_States33 - Not a health or safety regulation. It's not the federal governments place to ban blackface makeup.
34 - Lets lawyers make an additional argument to the jury.
35 - Basically clarifies that vitamins and the like can talk about the product on the label.
36 - Hilarious often forgotten law. Look at the back of an old Franklin half dollar.
37 - Its part of a treaty.
38 - Nutritionists agree, its added sugars that matter on labels.
39 - Its a common practice and resolves the issue of demonstrating ability to pay as the money is still tendered at the time of sale.
40 - Basically a safe harbor during actual emergency evacuations to ensure that the government is encouraging people to leave NFA firearms unattended for looters.
41 - Allows carry in public areas of the Post Office which is perfectly reasonable.
42 - Continues the criminal reform aims we have all been working towards.
43 - Relaxes the most expensive and ineffective part of Sarbanes Oxley for smaller firms
44 - Total exclusion from civil court isnt necessary.
45 - A very specific request, it was passed into law irl last year. Its for safety. Because it crosses federal land Congress needs to approve. Environmental protections are included.
46 - Designed to encourage persons to seek counseling without fear
47 - Reduces a burdensome paperwork requirement that doesnt affect safety
48 - Clarifies that sharing information is ok.
49 - This eliminates the arguably illegal regs targeted and military funeral protesters that the Supreme Court has found infringes free speech.
50 - Makes sure Fhtagn doesnt have to kill her pet tarantulas when she moves from Region to Region.
