130,000 more Democrats than Republicans voted in the Kentucky primaries (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:53:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  130,000 more Democrats than Republicans voted in the Kentucky primaries (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 130,000 more Democrats than Republicans voted in the Kentucky primaries  (Read 807 times)
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

« on: May 22, 2019, 12:35:37 PM »
« edited: May 22, 2019, 12:48:22 PM by swamiG »

I knew someone was going to post about this... So here is a map of the 2016 presidential election, by # of party primary/caucus ballots cast



Democrats win EC 307-231 and a narrow popular vote margin of 50.8%-49.2%
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2019, 12:54:51 PM »

I knew someone was going to post about this... So here is a map of the 2016 presidential election, by # of party primary/caucus ballots cast



Democrats win EC 304-234 and a narrow popular vote margin of 50.8%-49.2%

What's up with Wyoming? states like WV and KY can be explained by ancestral Democrats, but what explains Democrats getting more votes in Wyoming than Republicans did? unless that's an error...

Went back and corrected ND as well. Those two were "flukes" for the Democrats because the Republicans elected to do county conventions for those
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2019, 01:05:32 PM »

It’s not just that more people voted in the Dem primaries. That was to be expected. It’s that:

1. Andy Beshear, despite being in a tight three-way race, got more votes by himself than Matt Bevin, who is an incumbent governor.

2. Rocky Adkins, despite finishing second in the Dem primaries, got nearly as many votes by himself as Matt Bevin, again an incumbent governor.

3. Matt Bevin could barely hold on to 50% of the vote in his own party primary against a bunch of no-name challengers who had no campaigns to speak of. That is a humiliating and pathetic margin, there’s no other way around it.

4. Matt Bevin actually outright LOST several counties to one of those no-name challengers, including both some ancestrally Democratic Eastern Kentucky counties and most of the deepest Republican South Central Kentucky counties.

The conclusion from this can only be that Matt Bevin has unbelievably weak support from his own party, which is an ominous sign for him because it means Republican turnout might be greatly depressed in November, the opposite of how it was when he won in 2015. Combined with the fact that Bevin is literally the least popular governor in the country and Beshear is the son of a popular governor who himself managed to win in 2015 even as Bevin won, and I have to say that if you still think Bevin is the favorite you are either burying your head in the sand or are just plain ignorant of the political reality in Kentucky right now.

No I agree Bevin is endangered. He really might be screwed actually. I just think it's counterproductive to merely say that Dems are favored because they (as expected) had more primary ballots cast. Ultimately, I think it'll be close once Trump comes in with his rallies. But a Beshear +3 victory is what I'm guessing right now
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.