Opinion of Fuzzy Bear

[7,052,770]

Mega FF.

Burning in Hell to own the libs.

[DavidB.]

Mega FF.

Burning in Hell to own the libs.

Imagine thinking you (or any of us) can possibly know whether someone goes to hell.

[7,052,770]

Mega FF.

Burning in Hell to own the libs.

Imagine thinking you (or any of us) can possibly know whether someone goes to hell.

Yeah, it's pretty sick that Fundamentalist Christians are certain (and usually smug and giddy about it) that you and I will spend eternity burning together in Hell.

[DavidB.]

Mega FF.

Burning in Hell to own the libs.

Imagine thinking you (or any of us) can possibly know whether someone goes to hell.

Yeah, it's pretty sick that Fundamentalist Christians are certain (and usually smug and giddy about it) that you and I will spend eternity burning together in Hell.

I don't know, I've only heard left-wingers say stuff like that about me.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

In all fairness, isn't it a pretty standard religious belief that those not sharing the faith will recieve some form of cosmic punishment?

I agree with the Averoes post earlier this thread: FB is often a long winded blowhard, but attracts rather disproportionate ire, all things considered.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

In all fairness, isn't it a pretty standard religious belief that those not sharing the faith will recieve some form of cosmic punishment?

No that's only a fundamentalist Christian belief. My church seems to teach that there are "loopholes" allowing non-Christians to be saved and that's basically the positions of the Catholic and mainline Protestant churches.

[We Live in Black and White]

I don't care much for Jesus Jumpers.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Fuzzy Bear is less partisan than I am as well as He supported Gillum and Nelson while I did not . So all the dems on here doing who hating on him , is alienating a potential voter for your side .

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Fuzzy Bear is less partisan than I am as well as He supported Gillum and Nelson while I did not . So all the dems on here doing who hating on him , is alienating a potential voter for your side .

Supporting Rick Scott over Bill Nelson puts you on the same exact moral level as those who supported Roy Moore over Doug Jones and who supported Corey Stewart over Tim Kaine and who supported Cindy Hyde-Smith over Mike Espy and who supported Kris Kobach over Laura Kelly.

Fuzzy Bear = FF for opposing Rick Scott
Old School Republican = HP for supporting Rick Scott

[OSR stands with Israel]

Fuzzy Bear is less partisan than I am as well as He supported Gillum and Nelson while I did not . So all the dems on here doing who hating on him , is alienating a potential voter for your side .

Supporting Rick Scott over Bill Nelson puts you on the same exact moral level as those who supported Roy Moore over Doug Jones and who supported Corey Stewart over Tim Kaine and who supported Cindy Hyde-Smith over Mike Espy and who supported Kris Kobach over Laura Kelly.

Fuzzy Bear = FF for opposing Rick Scott
Old School Republican = HP for supporting Rick Scott

Lmao what Roy Moore , Corey Stewart are hard core racists , and one is a Pedo while Rick Scott was an excellent Governor and was cleared of any wrong doing in his past .

[DavidB.]

Supporting Rick Scott over Bill Nelson puts you on the same exact moral level as those who supported Roy Moore over Doug Jones and who supported Corey Stewart over Tim Kaine and who supported Cindy Hyde-Smith over Mike Espy and who supported Kris Kobach over Laura Kelly.

Sounds like me. Mad?

[Ban my account ffs!]

Remember when Fuzzy was doing this several times a week, rarely in threads that had anything to do with Bill Clinton or #MeToo or anything else that would make it at least somewhat on topic?

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

Juanita Broaddrick

He's got a new one now. And even though he's been told repeatedly by so many people that we don't think like this, he's just projecting, and we would still support treating immigrants humanely if they were all promised to never become citizens or even to become citizens so they could vote Republican. Also note that only 1 of the 4 threads has anything to do with immigration.

Democrats Abroad

Democrats Abroad

Democrats Abroad

Democrats Abroad

I'm sure we'll see this super clever zinger pollute many more unrelated threads over the next few months.

You are doing the Lord's work, Harry.

[Meclazine for Israel]

Fuzzy is a pillar of integrity in a landscape of feral democratic hyenas, many of whom hunt in packs.

Australians don't like a pack of sly dogs, a spiteful, vengeful mob setting upon one individual.

That's one of many reasons why I like Fuzzy Bear.

[Badger]

Mega FF.

Burning in Hell to own the libs.

Imagine thinking you (or any of us) can possibly know whether someone goes to hell.

Yeah, it's pretty sick that Fundamentalist Christians are certain (and usually smug and giddy about it) that you and I will spend eternity burning together in Hell.

I don't know, I've only heard left-wingers say stuff like that about me.

That only proves you've never had an in-depth conversation about the Afterlife with any fundamentalist Christian

[Progressive Pessimist]

I didn't want to quote it, since it's such a big post, but that Juanita Broaddrick stuff he was posting in so many threads reeks of hypocrisy. I'm assuming he posted that in threads about Trump's mistreatment of women, but in posting that he is implying that accusations are only true when they're against someone like Clinton, and that Trump's accusations possess no merit. Admittedly, a lot of Democrats perhaps were hypocrites and did her a disservice by not believing her and letting Bill Clinton escape his accusations. Speaking for myself, I was in diapers when that was all happening, so I can't say that I helped with hand-waving concerns about Clinton or anything. But that just makes Fuzzy look like a hypocrite too. Either every accuser with some credibility is believed, or none are. We all should know by now that picking and choosing, unless there is some evidence that proves they are lying, which in itself is fairly rare; that women's stories should be heard at the very least and not automatically assume that they are aiming to only damage someone or bring attention themselves.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I'm still praying for him, but his craven equivocation about the institution of concentration camps for children on US soil is making me feel better and better about my HP vote by the day.

[Fuzzy Bear]

I didn't want to quote it, since it's such a big post, but that Juanita Broaddrick stuff he was posting in so many threads reeks of hypocrisy. I'm assuming he posted that in threads about Trump's mistreatment of women, but in posting that he is implying that accusations are only true when they're against someone like Clinton, and that Trump's accusations possess no merit. Admittedly, a lot of Democrats perhaps were hypocrites and did her a disservice by not believing her and letting Bill Clinton escape his accusations. Speaking for myself, I was in diapers when that was all happening, so I can't say that I helped with hand-waving concerns about Clinton or anything. But that just makes Fuzzy look like a hypocrite too. Either every accuser with some credibility is believed, or none are. We all should know by now that picking and choosing, unless there is some evidence that proves they are lying, which in itself is fairly rare; that women's stories should be heard at the very least and not automatically assume that they are aiming to only damage someone or bring attention themselves.

What I was posting about was the fact that a whole slew of Clinton supporters who pretend that Bill's denial of Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey didn't happen.  Even worse, they wanted to just slough off Hillary's own treatment of Broaddrick and Willey and her whispering campaign labeling them as "nuts and sluts".  The hypocrisy of HILLARY Clinton and her supporters is epic.

"Either every accuser with some credibility is believed, or none are."  That's a statement that sounds good, but it's more about a narrative than about reality.  Jussie Smollett has "some credibility"; should we believe him?  Tawana Brawley was a young girl who said white police officers raped her, and she was backed by Al Sharpton and his attorneys; should she have been believed?  Should we still believe her today?  I would think not, but if we don't believe Tawana Brawley, do we not believe one of Cosby's accusers?  Well, no, but if we believe them, do we believe Catherine Crowell Webb, whose false account of a rape put an innocent man (Gary Dotson) in prison? 

If every accuser with some credibility is believe, what hope is there for the innocent and the wrongly accused?  What if that person being accused were you, and the accuser had "some credibility?

I don't think people have honestly thought through how dangerous it is to give a blank check of credibility to people making allegations of sexual assault against others irregardless of the facts.  There are REASONS to believe some allegations and be skeptical about others.  In a fair would, we would pick and choose on the basis of something other than which party the accused is identified with, but Atlas isn't a fair world, and when I'm here,  I know where I'm at.

[Rookie Yinzer]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

Fuzzy Bear’s positions you could argue is to the left of 95-00 Clinton

[💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

Fuzzy Bear’s positions you could argue is to the left of 95-00 Clinton

I would be pretty embarrassed if somebody described me as having political views that were 25 years out of date tbh.

[Boobs]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

Fuzzy Bear’s positions you could argue is to the left of 95-00 Clinton

I would be pretty embarrassed if somebody described me as having political views that were 25 years out of date tbh.

Fuzzy Bear's positions you could argue is to the left of 20-24 John W. Davis

[Virginiá]

These numbers are kind of interesting. I think this is probably a reasonable ceiling for someone whose beliefs piss off a lot of Atlas users but who is otherwise respectful and articulate.

If Fuzzy were more like an average Republican user in posting style, his FF numbers would probably crater.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

To be honest, I am willing to admit that the sexual assault allegations against Bill Clinton are just as much of a clear cut case of "he did it, and is guilty" as those against Clarence Thomas, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, and Brett Kavanaugh, and met the level to merit impeachment.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

Fuzzy Bear’s positions you could argue is to the left of 95-00 Clinton

I would be pretty embarrassed if somebody described me as having political views that were 25 years out of date tbh.

Fuzzy Bear is to the left of posters like Sunrise , and myself as well and is also much more of a swing voter than we are as well . Even RINO Tom whom many on here consider a liberal Republican is far more reliably Republican than Fuzzy as well.

So are you guys going to continue to try to alienate potential voters which is what you are doing here

[Joe Republic]

Don't agree with him on a variety of issues, but gentle and informed guy. Freedom fighter.

Your compulsive moderate heroism is giving us cancer.

LOL.

And Fuzzy is a massive HP. An apologist for rapists and racists.

Fuzzy Bear’s positions you could argue is to the left of 95-00 Clinton

I would be pretty embarrassed if somebody described me as having political views that were 25 years out of date tbh.

Fuzzy Bear is to the left of posters like Sunrise , and myself as well and is also much more of a swing voter than we are as well . Even RINO Tom whom many on here consider a liberal Republican is far more reliably Republican than Fuzzy as well.

So are you guys going to continue to try to alienate potential voters which is what you are doing here

He’s far, far right on immigration, abortion, LGBTQ issues, American nationalism, and Israel.  He’s also too old and stubborn to change those views (not that he’s obligated to do so).  The Democratic Party is a big tent, but there’s no warm welcome for any of those views in it, nor should there be.

Anyway, this is just the Atlas forum, not some Democratic campaign recruitment drive.  I for one won’t exhaust the effort required to recruit one old bigot back onto our side.