What is the ethnic composition of the neighborhood in which you live?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:43:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  What is the ethnic composition of the neighborhood in which you live?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: What is the ethnic composition of the neighborhood in which you live?  (Read 8186 times)
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: November 26, 2005, 12:50:05 PM »

Perry Vale

White, British: 58.29%
White, Irish: 3.18%
White, Other: 5.93%
Mixed, White & Caribbean: 1.90%
Mixed, White & African: 0.64%
Mixed, White & Asian: 0.62%
Mixed, Other Mixed: 0.92%
Asian, Indian: 1.57%
Asian, Pakistani: 0.35%
Asian, Bangladeshi: 0.56%
Asian, Other: 1.26%
Black, Caribbean: 13.71%
Black, African: 7.48%
Black, Other: 1.89%
Chinese: 0.77%
Other: 0.92%

Wow, proportions are very similar to the borough at large. Thanks Al! Where do you get all this stuff from?

www.statistics.gov.uk

Great site Smiley

Cool, could you possibly explain the "deprivation section" of the statistics.

http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/AreaProfile1.do?tab=4

Those are the results for my area, I am not entirely sure what some of the numbers mean, haha.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,671
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: November 26, 2005, 01:13:59 PM »

Cool, could you possibly explain the "deprivation section" of the statistics.

http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/AreaProfile1.do?tab=4

Those are the results for my area, I am not entirely sure what some of the numbers mean, haha.

Of the three indices they've got in the little box, the first means that Lewisham is the 57th most deprived local authority in England (see the little scale thingy just above that) when everything is taken into account and averaged, the second means that it's the 23rd most "income deprived" (this is the closest to the measure of poverty in the U.S, btw) LA, and the last one means that it's the 37th most deprived for employment.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: November 26, 2005, 01:18:58 PM »

First figure is the St Clements ward of Oxford, and the second one is Oxford as a whole.

White; British      72.97   76.75
White; Irish      1.83   2.16
White; Other White   10.12   8.20

Mixed; White and Black Caribbean   0.65   0.77
Mixed; White and Black African      0.19   0.28
Mixed; White and Asian        0.80   0.73
Mixed; Other Mixed         0.87   0.64

Asian or Asian British; Indian      1.47   1.73
Asian or Asian British; Pakistani   4.40   1.96
Asian or Asian British; Bangladeshi   1.03   0.65
Asian or Asian British; Other Asian   0.58   0.48

Black or Black British; Caribbean   0.84   1.24
Black or Black British; African      1.05   1.05
Black or Black British; Other Black   0.14   0.22

Chinese         1.69   1.83
Other Ethnic Group   1.38   1.31
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: November 26, 2005, 01:38:13 PM »

Cool, could you possibly explain the "deprivation section" of the statistics.

http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/AreaProfile1.do?tab=4

Those are the results for my area, I am not entirely sure what some of the numbers mean, haha.

Of the three indices they've got in the little box, the first means that Lewisham is the 57th most deprived local authority in England (see the little scale thingy just above that) when everything is taken into account and averaged, the second means that it's the 23rd most "income deprived" (this is the closest to the measure of poverty in the U.S, btw) LA, and the last one means that it's the 37th most deprived for employment.

Thanks. Hmmm, didn't realise Lewisham was so far down the scale in England.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,671
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: November 26, 2005, 01:40:20 PM »

Thanks. Hmmm, didn't realise Lewisham was so far down the scale in England.

It's largely because of Deptford IIRC
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: November 26, 2005, 02:59:06 PM »

Thanks. Hmmm, didn't realise Lewisham was so far down the scale in England.

It's largely because of Deptford IIRC

Quite possible.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: November 26, 2005, 08:02:22 PM »

my census tract (4,828 people)

Race
83.8 - White
10.1 - Asian
2.3 - Hispanic
2.2 - Two or more races
1.3 - Black
0.2 - Native American
0.1 - Other
0.04 - Pacific Islander


More specific profile for my census tract:
22.0 - German
16.7 - English
14.9 - Irish
5.8 - Swedish
4.9 - Norwegian
4.9 - Scottish
4.5 - United States or American
4.2 - Chinese
3.6 - Italian
3.2 - French
2.2 - Dutch
2.2 - Asian Indian
1.7 - Russian
1.5 - Scotch-Irish
1.4 - Japanese
1.4 - Black or African American
1.2 - Mexcian
1.1 - Danish
1.1 - French Canadian
1.1 - Polish
1.0 - Korean
1.0 - Hungarian
0.9 - Arab
0.6 - Ukrainian
0.6 - Welsh
0.5 - Czech
0.5 - Greek
0.5 - Lithuanian
0.4 - Spanish
0.4 - Filipino
0.3 - Vietnamese
0.2 - Slovak
0.2 - Venezuelan
0.2 - Native American
0.1 - Puerto Rican
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,704


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: November 26, 2005, 09:00:12 PM »

How'd you get census tract level information?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: November 26, 2005, 09:16:40 PM »

99.8% white

Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: November 26, 2005, 11:14:19 PM »

White 82.8%
Hispanic 6.5%
Black  4.8%
Asian  3.8%  [Of which 1.9% Indian, 0.7% Chinese]
American Indian  0.1%

Italian   29.6
Irish      21.7
German 11.3
English  10.0
Polish    3.0
American 2.5
Russian 2.4
French   2.3
Scottish 2.2
West Indian 1.3
Dutch    1.2
Scotch-Irish 1.2
Other     A lot.

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: November 27, 2005, 02:00:57 AM »

How'd you get census tract level information?

Try this link

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/AGSGeoAddressServlet?_lang=en&_programYear=50&_treeId=420
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: November 27, 2005, 02:04:13 AM »

    * White Non-Hispanic (90.7%)
    * Black (3.0%)
    * Chinese (2.2%)
    * Korean (1.9%)
    * Hispanic (0.7%)

Ancestries: Irish (22.8%), German (19.0%), Italian (13.3%), English (12.5%), Russian (8.8%), Polish (5.2%).
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,450


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: November 27, 2005, 03:39:41 AM »


 
Census Track 3,847 people 
 
One race
 3,831
 99.6
 
White
 3,693
 96.0
 
Black or African American
 22
 0.6
 
American Indian and Alaska Native
 0
 0.0
 
Asian
 96
 2.5
 
Asian Indian
 32
 0.8
 
Chinese
 49
 1.3
 
Filipino
 6
 0.2
 
Japanese
 0
 0.0
 
Korean
 4
 0.1
 
Vietnamese
 0
 0.0
 
Other Asian 1
 5
 0.1
 
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
 1
 0.0
 
Native Hawaiian
 0
 0.0
 
Guamanian or Chamorro
 0
 0.0
 
Samoan
 1
 0.0
 
Other Pacific Islander 2
 0
 0.0
 
Some other race
 19
 0.5
 
Two or more races
 16
 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
Race alone or in combination with one or more other races 3
 
 
 
White
 3,706
 96.3
 
Black or African American
 28
 0.7
 
American Indian and Alaska Native
 1
 0.0
 
Asian
 102
 2.7
 
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
 1
 0.0
 
Some other race
 25
 0.6
 
 
 
 
 
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
 
 
 
Total population
 3,847
 100.0
 
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
 137
 3.6
 
Mexican
 6
 0.2
 
Puerto Rican
 68
 1.8
 
Cuban
 13
 0.3
 
Other Hispanic or Latino
 50
 1.3
 
Not Hispanic or Latino
 3,710
 96.4
 
White alone
 3,581
 93.1
 
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: November 27, 2005, 07:35:39 AM »


You can always move if that's too white for you.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: November 27, 2005, 09:06:49 AM »


Such things do not exist.... Wink
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: November 27, 2005, 10:39:46 AM »

I plan to move outta here as soon as im 18. I need a mix of races, cultures, and religion, and im afraid that rural 99.8% white, 99% Christian (60% catholic, 40% Lutheran) doesnt quite meet that mark. Wink
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: November 27, 2005, 10:51:10 AM »

I plan to move outta here as soon as im 18. I need a mix of races, cultures, and religion, and im afraid that rural 99.8% white, 99% Christian (60% catholic, 40% Lutheran) doesnt quite meet that mark. Wink

It is nice to have some mix, but I do think that on the whole, "diversity" is overrated.  I have no problem with diversity if it doesn't require me to sacrifice quality of life, but in reality, it often does, unfortunately, and this is the unpalatable fact that many people like to gloss over.
Logged
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: November 27, 2005, 04:57:22 PM »

My neighborhood is completely white.  Although here in New York, it's extremely diverse.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: November 28, 2005, 08:52:59 AM »

84.78% White
9.38% African American
0.86% Native American
2.09% Asian,
0.03% Pacific Islander,
0.89% from other races, and
1.97% from two or more races.
2.44% of the population are Hispanic
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,450


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: December 09, 2005, 03:54:00 AM »

Bored tonight, so decided to look further for my Precinct

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total population
 1,378
 100.0
 1,027
 100.0
 
One race
 1,375
 99.8
 1,025
 99.8
 
White
 1,296
 94.0
 978
 95.2
 
Black or African American
 15
 1.1
 9
 0.9
 
American Indian and Alaska Native
 0
 0.0
 0
 0.0
 
Asian
 61
 4.4
 36
 3.5
 
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
 0
 0.0
 0
 0.0
 
Some other race
 3
 0.2
 2
 0.2
 
Two or more races
 3
 0.2
 2
 0.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total population
 1,378
 100.0
 1,027
 100.0
 
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
 31
 2.2
 21
 2.0
 
Not Hispanic or Latino
 1,347
 97.8
 1,006
 98.0
 
One race
 1,346
 97.7
 1,006
 98.0
 
White
 1,270
 92.2
 961
 93.6
 
Black or African American
 15
 1.1
 9
 0.9
 
American Indian and Alaska Native
 0
 0.0
 0
 0.0
 
Asian
 61
 4.4
 36
 3.5
 
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
 0
 0.0
 0
 0.0
 
Some other race
 0
 0.0
 0
 0.0
 
Two or more races
 1
 0.1
 0
 0.0
 


Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: December 10, 2005, 02:01:55 PM »
« Edited: December 10, 2005, 02:03:31 PM by phknrocket1k »

I plan to move outta here as soon as im 18. I need a mix of races, cultures, and religion, and im afraid that rural 99.8% white, 99% Christian (60% catholic, 40% Lutheran) doesnt quite meet that mark. Wink

It is nice to have some mix, but I do think that on the whole, "diversity" is overrated.  I have no problem with diversity if it doesn't require me to sacrifice quality of life, but in reality, it often does, unfortunately, and this is the unpalatable fact that many people like to gloss over.

Not true at all, many minorities here in CA are more economically ambitous and upward mobile than the actual native whites, mostly Asian and South Asians. Especially noted in places like San Jose.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: December 10, 2005, 02:07:52 PM »

I plan to move outta here as soon as im 18. I need a mix of races, cultures, and religion, and im afraid that rural 99.8% white, 99% Christian (60% catholic, 40% Lutheran) doesnt quite meet that mark. Wink

It is nice to have some mix, but I do think that on the whole, "diversity" is overrated.  I have no problem with diversity if it doesn't require me to sacrifice quality of life, but in reality, it often does, unfortunately, and this is the unpalatable fact that many people like to gloss over.

Not true at all, many minorities here in CA are more economically ambitous and upward mobile than the actual native whites, mostly Asian and South Asians. Especially noted in places like San Jose.

That's great, but those aren't the minorities that people generally refer to when they talk about the need for 'diversity.'  'Diversity' is effectively pushed as a charitable measure to aid disadvantaged minorities.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: December 10, 2005, 02:12:38 PM »

I plan to move outta here as soon as im 18. I need a mix of races, cultures, and religion, and im afraid that rural 99.8% white, 99% Christian (60% catholic, 40% Lutheran) doesnt quite meet that mark. Wink

It is nice to have some mix, but I do think that on the whole, "diversity" is overrated.  I have no problem with diversity if it doesn't require me to sacrifice quality of life, but in reality, it often does, unfortunately, and this is the unpalatable fact that many people like to gloss over.

Not true at all, many minorities here in CA are more economically ambitous and upward mobile than the actual native whites, mostly Asian and South Asians. Especially noted in places like San Jose.

That's great, but those aren't the minorities that people generally refer to when they talk about the need for 'diversity.'  'Diversity' is effectively pushed as a charitable measure to aid disadvantaged minorities.

We don't really have that many blacks for that kind of 'diversity', so we go by a different definition. Our disadvantaged are the Hispanics largely and they are becoming more upward mobile as well.

Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: December 10, 2005, 04:52:42 PM »


We don't really have that many blacks for that kind of 'diversity', so we go by a different definition. Our disadvantaged are the Hispanics largely and they are becoming more upward mobile as well.



Good.  I like upward mobility.  I hate categorizing people as 'minorities' because it implies that they are permanently different.  'Minority' status should only be temporary.  For blacks, it seems at this point to be permanent, and I think that's very tragic.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: December 10, 2005, 05:41:08 PM »


We don't really have that many blacks for that kind of 'diversity', so we go by a different definition. Our disadvantaged are the Hispanics largely and they are becoming more upward mobile as well.



Good.  I like upward mobility.  I hate categorizing people as 'minorities' because it implies that they are permanently different.  'Minority' status should only be temporary.  For blacks, it seems at this point to be permanent, and I think that's very tragic.

Blacks are quite different from other minorities and probably would require different approaches.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 11 queries.