In each election without an incumbent, was the winner more or less experienced? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 10:20:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  In each election without an incumbent, was the winner more or less experienced? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In each election without an incumbent, was the winner more or less experienced?  (Read 763 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


« on: July 02, 2019, 10:53:04 PM »
2016: Less
2008: Less
2000: Less
1988: More
1968: More
1960: Tie
1952: Less
1928: Less
1920: Less
1908: Less
1896: More
1884: Less
1880: More
1876: Not sure
1868: Less
1860: Least
1856: More
1852: More
1848: Less
1844: Less
1836: More
1828: Less
1824: More
1816: More?
1808: More?
1796: Less
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2019, 01:21:35 PM »
Quote from: MillennialModerate on July 03, 2019, 06:05:55 AM

JFK was far and away the better candidate, no one with a brain would argue that BUT
Id say Nixon had more experience by virtue of being Vice President for 8 years

They came into Congress at the same time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.