A Burning Cross, Virginia v. Black (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:13:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  A Burning Cross, Virginia v. Black (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The ruling was...
#1
Constitutionally sound
 
#2
Constitutionally unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 8

Author Topic: A Burning Cross, Virginia v. Black  (Read 4804 times)
Yates
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.54

« on: November 27, 2005, 07:23:41 PM »

Constitutionally unsound. The cross is a sign of terrorism, and is about as protected under the First Amendment as brandishing an assault rifle.

I surprise even myself in agreeing with you.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.