Romney Trails two Democrats in new Poll
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 01:17:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  Romney Trails two Democrats in new Poll
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Romney Trails two Democrats in new Poll  (Read 10251 times)
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 28, 2005, 02:59:13 PM »

http://www.statehousenews.com/public/Poll/ESumm.htm

State House News Poll (352 registered  voters)

Tom Reilly: 52%
Romney: 36%

William Gavin: 46%
Romney: 41%

Romney: 42%
Deval Patrick: 40%

Reilly and Gavin (if he runs) are the two Democratic "establisment" candidates, while Deval Patrick is the little known newcomer. If I was in Massachusetts, I'd be voting for Patrick in the primary. From what I've seen and read, he is an exciting candidate.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,071
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2005, 03:03:56 PM »

So of the three Democrats, you'd support the only one who is currently losing?  Way to go. Wink
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2005, 03:23:29 PM »

So of the three Democrats, you'd support the only one who is currently losing?  Way to go. Wink

Was that a joke?

Anyway, Patrick is by far the least known candidate and I have no problem with supporting him.  He is a progressive, reform-minded Democrat.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2005, 04:09:16 PM »

So of the three Democrats, you'd support the only one who is currently losing?  Way to go. Wink

Was that a joke?

Anyway, Patrick is by far the least known candidate and I have no problem with supporting him.  He is a progressive, reform-minded Democrat.

patrick has a horrible organization.  i dont think he will be much of a factor in the primary.

patrick has also upset some of the libs by being an outspoken supporter of one president bush's controversial ambassador nominees....i cant remember the name right off.

reilly is a boring candidate, who has a squishy position (to say the least) on gay marriage.

rommey can and would beat any of the three mentioned candidates in the poll.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2005, 04:22:24 PM »

patrick has a horrible organization.  i dont think he will be much of a factor in the primary.

You could be right, but the primary is a long ways off and he has plenty of time to make himself known.

rommey can and would beat any of the three mentioned candidates in the poll.

Nah, Massachusetts is already sick of their flip-flopping governor who travels around the country insulting his own state.  He will be gone, whether he declines to run again or gets voted out.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,071
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2005, 04:28:26 PM »
« Edited: November 28, 2005, 05:23:11 PM by Joe Republic »

So of the three Democrats, you'd support the only one who is currently losing?  Way to go. Wink

Was that a joke?

Not really.  You posted a thread containing three polls; two showing Romney losing.  You declared your support for the only one that Romney is beating.

Anyway, Patrick is by far the least known candidate and I have no problem with supporting him.  He is a progressive, reform-minded Democrat.

A progressive liberal reformer?  Just what Massachusetts needs.

(That was a joke.)
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2005, 04:30:00 PM »

Not really.  You posted a thread containing three polls; two showing Romney losing.  You declared your support for the only one that Romney is beating.

Nothing wrong with that. Like I said, Patrick is by far the least known of the candidates.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2005, 04:32:25 PM »

Not really.  You posted a thread containing three polls; two showing Romney losing.  You declared your support for the only one that Romney is beating.

Nothing wrong with that. Like I said, Patrick is by far the least known of the candidates.

is patrick really qualified to be governor?

he was a rather low ranking lawyer in the clinton justice department.

maybe he should try for lt. gov or a state legislature seat before running for governor?
Logged
riceowl
riceowl315
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2005, 05:14:07 PM »


Anyway, Patrick is by far the least known candidate and I have no problem with supporting him.  He is a progressive, reform-minded Democrat.

A progressive liberal reformer?  Just what Massachusetts needs.

(That was a joke.)

...now I KNOW you weren't quoting yourself there...yet my eyes deceive me.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,071
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2005, 05:24:10 PM »

...now I KNOW you weren't quoting yourself there...yet my eyes deceive me.

You have a sharp eye.  I'd be careful next time you blink, lest you cut your eyelids off.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2005, 10:02:49 PM »

The sooner the Bay State gets rid of that Mormon Governor, the better. I'd support a lot of Republicans for MA governor rather than have Brigham Romney and his biblical laws remain in office.
Logged
Yates
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.54

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2005, 10:16:33 PM »

Who is Gavin?  I don't remember hearing of him.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2005, 11:08:32 PM »

Who is Gavin?  I don't remember hearing of him.

mass sec of state
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2005, 01:54:43 PM »

I'd like to see a Democrat take the Governership but with significantly more Republicans in the state legislature. Too much one party dominance can be a bad thing

Dave
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2005, 02:42:18 PM »

I'd like to see a Democrat take the Governership but with significantly more Republicans in the state legislature. Too much one party dominance can be a bad thing

Dave

i doubt you will see any pickups for the republicans in the state house.

the gop is pretty uncompetitive in state house races over most of the state.

they field competitive candidates on the cape.  that is about it.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2005, 06:01:11 AM »

I'd like to see a Democrat take the Governership but with significantly more Republicans in the state legislature. Too much one party dominance can be a bad thing

Dave

I agree with you, but until marriage rights are firmly established, the legislature must stay strongly Democrat. I'd prefer that a REAL moderate Republican become Governor. Whatever happened to Patrick Guerrero, Swift's Lieutenant Gov.? Or maybe Weld should run here instead of New York, where the polls show he is unknown and unpopular. I liked Weld.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2005, 09:34:07 AM »

I'd like to see a Democrat take the Governership but with significantly more Republicans in the state legislature. Too much one party dominance can be a bad thing

Dave

I agree with you, but until marriage rights are firmly established, the legislature must stay strongly Democrat. I'd prefer that a REAL moderate Republican become Governor. Whatever happened to Patrick Guerrero, Swift's Lieutenant Gov.? Or maybe Weld should run here instead of New York, where the polls show he is unknown and unpopular. I liked Weld.

i follow the mass state legislature pretty closely and i must say there is a pretty distinct conservative/liberal split (particularly on social issues) among the democrats.

it kind of reminds me of the old south in a lot of ways with the conservate-liberal democrat split.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2005, 02:09:29 PM »


i follow the mass state legislature pretty closely and i must say there is a pretty distinct conservative/liberal split (particularly on social issues) among the democrats.


Would you say that split was along religious lines? Massachussetts Protestants (31% of voters) supported Kerry (60-39) but Catholics (43% of voters) only broke (51-49) for Kerry. Jews and the non-religious broke heavily for Kerry

Dave
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2005, 03:08:11 PM »


i follow the mass state legislature pretty closely and i must say there is a pretty distinct conservative/liberal split (particularly on social issues) among the democrats.


Would you say that split was along religious lines? Massachussetts Protestants (31% of voters) supported Kerry (60-39) but Catholics (43% of voters) only broke (51-49) for Kerry. Jews and the non-religious broke heavily for Kerry

Dave

yes it is most certainly a religious split.  from what i can tell, most of the conservative dems in the mass legislature are devout catholics and represent primarily blue collar areas.
Logged
Blerpiez
blerpiez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,017


Political Matrix
E: -0.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 02, 2006, 07:40:20 PM »

Despite Romney drooping out months ago, I need somewhere to post this:

Tom Reilly is in lots of trouble now because his running mate has dropped out.  It turns out she owes over $50,000 in student loans and unpaid taxes and yesterday she withdrew.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/02/02/reillys_pick_withdraws_from_race/
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2006, 07:55:33 PM »

If Romney runs for re-election for Governor of Massachusetts, he wins. 

These polls are meaningless this far out.

Romney's campaigning , debating, and speaking abilities are second to none.

Hopefully, a sane legislature will be elected, and overturn this looney same sex marriage bill.   
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2006, 07:58:02 PM »

If Romney runs for re-election for Governor of Massachusetts, he wins. 
 

He already stated months ago that he wouldn't run again.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,696


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2006, 07:59:09 PM »

If Romney runs for re-election for Governor of Massachusetts, he wins. 

These polls are meaningless this far out.

Romney's campaigning , debating, and speaking abilities are second to none.

Hopefully, a sane legislature will be elected, and overturn this looney same sex marriage bill.   

OMG Republicans will landslide in Massachusetts!
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,071
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2006, 08:08:54 PM »

If Romney runs for re-election for Governor of Massachusetts, he wins. 
 

He already stated months ago that he wouldn't run again.

Even if he was going to, he'd lose.  He's bad-mouthed the state far too often for them to stomach.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2006, 08:59:58 PM »

If Romney runs for re-election for Governor of Massachusetts, he wins. 

These polls are meaningless this far out.

Romney's campaigning , debating, and speaking abilities are second to none.

Hopefully, a sane legislature will be elected, and overturn this looney same sex marriage bill.   

OMG Republicans will landslide in Massachusetts!

Well, we can always hope.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 15 queries.