And WMS, yeah some of the conclusions are unusual and unexpected. I realized after I had defined terrorism, that there were things that fit the definition that we don't usually think of as terrorism. And I can't very well say World War II was an immoral war because of daylight bombing killing civilians, can I? So I was essentialy stuck endorsing terrorism or becoming a pacifist. 
Which did you think I'd choose? 
Ah, reality strikes again.
No, you can't say that, for that would be an insane example of moral relativism.
Becoming a pacifist, clearly - All War is Wrong! No Matter What! Period! In this case, endorsing 'terrorism' is clearly the choice for you.
And me too. Now let's watch someone take this out of context and bash us as warmongers 
