Was Japan Fascist from 1931-1945?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:59:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Was Japan Fascist from 1931-1945?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Hi
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: Was Japan Fascist from 1931-1945?  (Read 10745 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 26, 2009, 07:19:55 AM »

No, I don't tend to think so.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2009, 07:26:42 AM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism_in_Sh%C5%8Dwa_Japan

It was influenced by fascism, but not fascist in that it lacked enough industrialization to be called truly corporatist.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2009, 02:24:16 PM »

Of course not.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2009, 02:27:45 PM »

I've always thought that too, but it seems to be a common conception among many people these days. Same with Finland, which certainly wasn't fascist.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2009, 02:40:24 PM »

No, it wasn't "fascism" per se. It was influenced by it however, and becoming an Axis Power wasn't admirable.

I contend that Brits shouldn't have terminated their Alliance with Japan.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2009, 02:42:57 PM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism_in_Sh%C5%8Dwa_Japan

It was influenced by fascism, but not fascist in that it lacked enough industrialization to be called truly corporatist.

If it was not fascist then it was pretty close and likely closer to Nazism.  It had many of the hallmarks: Extreme nationalism, militarism, authoritarianism, racial superiority, deification of the leader and corporatism.   The Zaibatsu of Japan and the influences they wielded were similarly to the large industrial companies in Nazi Germany..
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2009, 02:45:49 PM »



I contend that Brits shouldn't have terminated their Alliance with Japan.

I agree.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2009, 02:47:24 PM »



I contend that Brits shouldn't have terminated their Alliance with Japan.

I agree.

Please expand on this.....
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2009, 03:07:07 PM »

Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2009, 03:11:25 PM »

I've always thought that too, but it seems to be a common conception among many people these days. Same with Finland, which certainly wasn't fascist.

Finland was a democracy victimized by the Soviet Union.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2009, 03:28:37 PM »

I've always thought that too, but it seems to be a common conception among many people these days. Same with Finland, which certainly wasn't fascist.

Finland was a democracy victimized by the Soviet Union.

Pretty much. Though a relatively conservative/authoritarian democracy.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2009, 03:30:56 PM »

Finland were a heroic little country who fought the Soviets with skis.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2009, 03:34:48 PM »

Ironic really... a democratic Axis nation fighting for it's own survival against an autocratic collectivised Allied nation.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,772


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2009, 05:44:36 PM »

Fascist?  Not really, though  adjectives like "racist," "ultra-nationalist," "imperialist," "aggressively expansionist," and the like add up to a pretty similar picture.
Logged
JoeBrayson
Rookie
**
Posts: 51
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2009, 04:47:10 PM »

How did Japan and Germany co-ordinate themselves, I mean how did Nazi Germany ensure that Japan was 'on-message' with their aims and objectives. Was there any high level contact b/w the 2 powers during the war?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2009, 04:48:32 PM »

How did Japan and Germany co-ordinate themselves, I mean how did Nazi Germany ensure that Japan was 'on-message' with their aims and objectives. Was there any high level contact b/w the 2 powers during the war?

Other than the Anti-Comintern Pact etc., not really. Shortly after Pearl Harbour, the Allies tried searching for joint German-Japanese plans, and I don't think they ever found any.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2009, 07:05:46 PM »

They were definitely thought of as Fascist in the United States during the time period, and lumped with "the other fascist states" of Germany and Italy.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,772


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2009, 10:45:42 PM »

I should add that Barrington Moore thought that the Japanese were fascist, and his opinion is more valid than mine is.  However, that entire chapter of his book was murky and pretty unclear.

Have I mentioned before that I love Barrington Moore?  Any author who can, out of nowhere, go on a tangent that explains German history from the 1400s-present is pretty damn awesome.

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Origins-Dictatorship-Democracy-Peasant/dp/0807050733
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 25, 2009, 11:35:24 PM »



If it was not fascist then it was pretty close and likely closer to Nazism.  It had many of the hallmarks: Extreme nationalism, militarism, authoritarianism, racial superiority, deification of the leader and corporatism.   The Zaibatsu of Japan and the influences they wielded were similarly to the large industrial companies in Nazi Germany..

"Extreme nationalism, militarism, authoritarianism," marked many non-fascist regimes.  Racial superiority was prevalent in the US and probably in the UK at the same time. "Deification of the leader," was a practice that long predated modern Japan.

The Zaibatsu had had power from industrialization unlike the various corporations in Germany.

I would argue that even into the 1930's there was more dissent in Japan than in fascist nations.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 26, 2009, 02:00:20 AM »

If the definition of Fascism is a dictatorship with a market economy (aka a right-wing dictatorship), then yes, Japan was Fascist between 1931 and 1945 (and even before 1931).
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 27, 2009, 05:16:05 PM »

If the definition of Fascism is a dictatorship with a market economy (aka a right-wing dictatorship), then yes, Japan was Fascist between 1931 and 1945 (and even before 1931).

Fascism isn't pro-market. It's pro-corporatism.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2009, 12:32:20 AM »

If the definition of Fascism is a dictatorship with a market economy (aka a right-wing dictatorship), then yes, Japan was Fascist between 1931 and 1945 (and even before 1931).

Fascism isn't pro-market. It's pro-corporatism.

Depends on whose definition.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 14 queries.