I am, on principle, opposed to measures which have the potential to intimidate or compromise our relationship with our neighbors. I also believe that the territorial integrity of all regions, as defined by our Constitution, ought to be preserved. That is why I led the fight against Alaskan independence in January, that is why I recently condemned a new proposal for Lincoln to annex Minnesota and Iowa, and that is why I will be opposing this bill. While the bill does not direct government or military efforts to annex Kansas, at best it will threaten relations between Frémont and the South that have since been mended as a result of the Trade War. As far as I am concerned, no meaningful change can come of this except heightened tensions between the regions.
It is my firm belief that Atlasia works best when our regions work together in cooperation, rather than economic or political competition.
all this resolution is recognise a different flag as the flag of Kansas. The president did literally the same thing with his executive order recognising the black lives matter flag as the flag of the south.
I think the point is that is a stupid and pointless thing to do. Its the same as the South voting that Fremont's official tree is different from whatever Fremont itself says. Like, what? That's not how things work. Your "recognition" is worth as much as used toilet paper on this matter. Hey, while your at it, why not vote to recognize a new pope or to recognize St. Petersburg as the capital of Russia or to recognize December 25th as Independence Day for Australia? It has the same value.
