would democrats accept this 2A compromise

[freepcrusher]

where the law would be clarified that "the right for a law abiding adult to own a handgun in his/her own domicile with easy access (i.e. loaded with safety off on your nightstand) shall not be infringed. Any rights beyond this are subject to the states."

This would in effect mean that a liberal state (such as NY) would have the right to only allow one handgun per person and that all rifles could only be used at state-owned ranges. A more gun friendly state (like Montana) could allow open carries of AKs. I would like to think this would be an "everyone wins" situation. But I feel the left would be too stupid to accept this hypothetical compromise.

[freepcrusher]

This still makes it possible for people in states with stricter gun control laws to travel to states where laws are less strict, purchase higher capacity weapons, and go back home. Unless there's going to be law enforcement checking vehicles at every entry point in every state and also performing rigorous checks of every home for illegal weapons, this isn't much of a compromise.

that's not the point of gun control or isn't for me. I don't know if gun control will actually stop mass shootings but that's not the point of supporting them. The point is to say to the patriotard gadsden flag waving F150 driving nimrods that "you're not wanted here. GTFO".