Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:52:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992?  (Read 1513 times)
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,750


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« on: September 11, 2019, 06:22:13 PM »


In addition to MO, there would be a lot of other states (AR, KY, TN, WV) that would be more Democratic today if the party hasn't taken such a left turn 20 years ago.   In addition to the loss of electoral votes, that's ten Senate seats gone.  And becomes that much harder for the Democrats to control the Senate (which BTW confirms nominees for the Supreme Court) on a long term basis.

That is not why these states swung R. National Dems ran more left wing campaigns in the 1980s and 1970s than they do now, though perhaps that could change in the 2020s.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.